This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hinton, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hinton, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cancer Home Care Services Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Services given and help perceived during home care for terminal cancer

St Christopher's Hospice, London

Separate accounts of care were recorded weekly from staff, patients and relatives in a randomised sample of patients with terminal cancer referred to a home care service with readily available beds. Various services were involved but nurses made most contacts, 3.0 visits and 2.4 phone calls weekly, rising sharply in the last week. General practitioners averaged 0.4 visits/week but their considerable variation evoked either praise or criticism. Maintaining contact, giving explanations and support were reported to help as often as physical treatments and practical nursing, although staff's and recipients' accounts differed slightly. Help succeeded for many problems, but weakness was common, often grew worse and led to more admissions than pain. Difficulties in relieving fatigue and strain in relatives also curtailed home care. Subsequent home care team reorganisation to strengthen linkage between particular nurses and patients and the improvement of day care services were associated with successive but modest rises from the original 27% to 34% of patients dying at home. Implications of the results for services and skills required for home care are discussed, noting the problems that deserve further attention.

Key Words: cancer care facilities • family • home care services • patient satisfaction • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 2, 125-134 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639601000207


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Goldschmidt, M. Groenvold, A. T. Johnsen, A. S Stromgren, A. Krasnik, and L. Schmidt Cooperating with a palliative home-care team: expectations and evaluations of GPs and district nurses Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2005; 19(3): 241 - 250. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Armes and J. Addington-Hall Perspectives on symptom control in patients receiving community palliative care Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2003; 17(7): 608 - 615. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. K. George Research Design in End-of-Life Research: State of Science Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(90003): 86 - 98. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S R. Cohen, P. Boston, B. M Mount, and P. Porterfield Changes in quality of life following admission to palliative care units Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2001; 15(5): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Krishnasamy, E. Wilkie, and J. Haviland Lung cancer health care needs assessment: patients' and informal carers' responses to a national mail questionnaire survey Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2001; 15(3): 213 - 227. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E K Wilkinson, C Salisbury, N Bosanquet, P J Franks, S Kite, M Lorentzon, and A Naysmith Patient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature review Palliative Medicine, April 1, 1999; 13(3): 197 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hinton The progress of awareness and acceptance of dying assessed in cancer patients and their caring relatives Palliative Medicine, January 1, 1999; 13(1): 19 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Karlsen and J. Addington-Hall How do cancer patients who die at home differ from those who die elsewhere? Palliative Medicine, June 1, 1998; 12(4): 279 - 286. [Abstract] [PDF]