Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sykes, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sykes, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

An investigation of the ability of oral naloxone to correct opioid-related constipation in patients with advanced cancer

NP Sykes

University of Leeds

A dose-ranging study of the use of oral naloxone in opioid-related constipation in patients with far-advanced cancer is reported. Naloxone doses were calculated as a percentage of the morphine dose each patient was receiving. Seventeen patients entered the first phase of the study, which had a randomised, double-blind design. Outcome measures were small bowel transit time (SBTT) measured by the lactulose/hydrogen breath test, pain scores and the occurrence of adverse events.

One subject was excluded before receiving naloxone. No significant difference between placebo and naloxone occurred in the 14 remaining patients receiving total daily doses of naloxone 10% or less of the 24 h dose of morphine. Two further patients experienced a marked laxative effect with naloxone at 20% of the 24 h dose of morphine. In one of these, SBTT was available and was unchanged from placebo. The other declined to continue with SBTT measurement.

Phase two of the study had an open design, in which laxative effects were determined clinically. Naloxone at a maximum dose level of 20% was given to seven patients, up to 40% to two patients and up to 80% to one patient. Four out of the seven patients in the 20% dose level group, and all of the remainder, experienced laxative effects. Two patients experienced symptoms of opioid withdrawal, one of whom also had return of pain.

It is concluded that oral naloxone at a daily dose of 20% or more of the prevailing 24 h morphine dose is a potentially valuable therapy for opioid- related constipation. However, opioid withdrawal was observed and it is suggested that initial individual naloxone doses should not exceed 5 mg. Further research is needed into the oral absorption of naloxone, as well as further studies of clinical efficacy and dosing.

Key Words: constipation • opioids • palliative treatment • naloxone • cathartics

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 2, 135-144 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639601000208


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Thomas, S. Karver, G. A. Cooney, B. H. Chamberlain, C. K. Watt, N. E. Slatkin, N. Stambler, A. B. Kremer, and R. J. Israel
Methylnaltrexone for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Advanced Illness
N. Engl. J. Med., May 29, 2008; 358(22): 2332 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
R. G Twycross, P. McNamara, C. Schuijt, M. A Kamm, and C. Jordan
Sodium picosulfate in opioid-induced constipation: results of an open-label, prospective, dose-ranging study
Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2006; 20(4): 419 - 423.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
E J Hall and N P Sykes
Analgesia for patients with advanced disease: I
Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2004; 80(941): 148 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
J. J. Bates, J. F. Foss, and D. B. Murphy
Are Peripheral Opioid Antagonists the Solution to Opioid Side Effects?
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 116 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
A. Taguchi, N. Sharma, R. M. Saleem, D. I. Sessler, R. L. Carpenter, M. Seyedsadr, and A. Kurz
Selective Postoperative Inhibition of Gastrointestinal Opioid Receptors
N. Engl. J. Med., September 27, 2001; 345(13): 935 - 940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Cherny, C. Ripamonti, J. Pereira, C. Davis, M. Fallon, H. McQuay, S. Mercadante, G. Pasternak, and V. Ventafridda
Strategies to Manage the Adverse Effects of Oral Morphine: An Evidence-Based Report
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2001; 19(9): 2542 - 2554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
C. S. Bloss
Pharmacomodulation of the Gut: Implications for the Enterally Fed Patient
Nutr Clin Pract, October 1, 1998; 13(5): 201 - 214.
[Abstract] [PDF]