Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Payne, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hillier, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Perceptions of a 'good' death: a comparative study of the views of hospice staff and patients

SA Payne

School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, University of Southampton

A. Langley-Evans

Department of Psychology, University of Southampton

R. Hillier

Countess Mountbatten House, Southampton

The literature suggests that health professionals working in palliative care have developed an idealised concept of dying which has been labelled the 'good' death. This paper reports the results of a preliminary qualitative study which compared the concepts of a 'good' death used by patients and staff in a palliative care unit. Semistructured interviews designed to elicit perceptions of 'good' and 'bad' deaths were conducted with 18 patients and 20 health professionals. The transcribed interviews were content analysed. There were major differences between the views of patients and staff. The patients' descriptions of a 'good' death were diverse and included: dying in one's sleep, dying quietly, with dignity, being pain free and dying suddenly. In comparison, staff characterised a 'good' death in terms of adequate symptom control, family involvement, peacefulness and lack of distress, while a 'bad' death was described as involving uncontrolled symptoms, lack of acceptance and being young. The findings suggest that patients and staff differ in their conceptualisations of a 'good' death.

Key Words: attitude to death • hospices • patients • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 4, 307-312 (1996)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639601000406


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br Med BullHome page
F. Hicks and E. Rees
A 'pain-free' death
Br. Med. Bull., December 1, 2008; 88(1): 23 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
M. Miyashita, T. Morita, S. Tsuneto, K. Sato, and Y. Shima
The Japan HOspice and Palliative Care Evaluation Study (J-HOPE Study): Study Design and Characteristics of Participating Institutions
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2008; 25(3): 223 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. Hales, C. Zimmermann, and G. Rodin
The Quality of Dying and Death
Arch Intern Med, May 12, 2008; 168(9): 912 - 918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M Sanjo, M Miyashita, T Morita, K Hirai, M Kawa, T Akechi, and Y Uchitomi
Preferences regarding end-of-life cancer care and associations with good-death concepts: a population-based survey in Japan
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1539 - 1547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M Miyashita, M Sanjo, T Morita, K Hirai, and Y Uchitomi
Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study
Ann. Onc., June 1, 2007; 18(6): 1090 - 1097.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
J. A. Rietjens, A. van der Heide, B. D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, P. J van der Maas, and G. van der Wal
Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2006; 20(7): 685 - 692.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
M. Dobratz
A Comparative Study of Variables That Have an Impact on Noncancer End-of-Life Diagnoses
Clin Nurs Res, November 1, 2004; 13(4): 309 - 325.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
E. K. Vig and R. A. Pearlman
Good and Bad Dying From the Perspective of Terminally Ill Men
Arch Intern Med, May 10, 2004; 164(9): 977 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
S. Kim and Y. Lee
Korean Nurses' Attitudes to Good and Bad Death, Life-Sustaining Treatment and Advance Directives
Nursing Ethics, November 1, 2003; 10(6): 624 - 637.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
O. Fried
Palliative care for patients with end-stage renal failure: reflections from Central Australia
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2003; 17(6): 514 - 519.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S. Brajtman
The impact on the family of terminal restlessness and its management
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2003; 17(5): 454 - 460.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. M. Chochinov
Dignity-Conserving Care--A New Model for Palliative Care: Helping the Patient Feel Valued
JAMA, May 1, 2002; 287(17): 2253 - 2260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
G. Copp and D. Field
Open awareness and dying: The use of denial and acceptance as coping strategies by hospice patients
Journal of Research in Nursing, March 1, 2002; 7(2): 118 - 127.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
D. Field and G. Copp
Communication and awareness about dying in the 1990s
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 1999; 13(6): 459 - 468.
[Abstract] [PDF]