This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Seale, C. Articles by Kelly, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seale, C. Articles by Kelly, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A comparison of hospice and hospital care for people who die: views of the surviving spouse

Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths College, London

Moira Kelly

Department of Sociology, Goldsmiths College, London

To compare the quality of inpatient care for dying people in St Christopher's Hospice, London and nearby hospitals in 1994 and make comparisons with earlier studies of the same setting, interviews were undertaken with spouses of people who had died from cancer in these settings, matched by age and sex.

The subjects comprised 66 people who had died in 1994, 33 of whom had died in the hospice, 33 in local hospitals. The mean age was 70.2, 61 % were male.

The hospice group were more likely to know that they were dying and less likely to be admitted as emergencies. Treatment for pain, breathlessness and nausea from both sources provided relief in almost all cases. Most information about the illness was given by hospital doctors before hospice care occurred. Where it occurred, communication by hospice staff was judged better than that by hospital doctors. Staff in hospitals were more likely to be judged 'very busy'. Hospice respondents were less likely to want improvements, and more likely to judge the institution as being 'like a family'. Earlier studies had shown a trend for symptom control to have improved in hospitals but for difference in the psychosocial climate to favour the hospice. By 1994, this latter difference was still obtained.

We stress the role of hospital staff and general practitioners in helping patients accept a terminal prognosis, so that better-planned care can proceed. The busy public atmosphere of some hospital wards may not be conducive to the good care of dying people.

Key Words: hospices • terminal care • palliative care • quality of health care • evaluation studies • hospitals

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 2, 93-100 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639701100202


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Addington-Hall and A. O'Callaghan A comparison of the quality of care provided to cancer patients in the UK in the last three months of life in in-patient hospices compared with hospitals, from the perspective of bereaved relatives: results from a survey using the VOICES questionnaire Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2009; 23(3): 190 - 197. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Miyashita, T. Morita, and K. Hirai Evaluation of End-of-Life Cancer Care From the Perspective of Bereaved Family Members: The Japanese Experience J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2008; 26(23): 3845 - 3852. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. Dumont, S. Dumont, and S. Mongeau End-of-Life Care and the Grieving Process: Family Caregivers Who Have Experienced the Loss of a Terminal-Phase Cancer Patient Qual Health Res, August 1, 2008; 18(8): 1049 - 1061. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Thulesius, A. Hakansson, and K. Petersson Balancing: A Basic Process in End-of-Life Cancer Care Qual Health Res, December 1, 2003; 13(10): 1353 - 1377. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T Morita, S Chihara, and T Kashiwagi Family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care in Japan Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2002; 16(3): 185 - 193. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. H. Rasmussen, L. Jansson, and A. Norberg Striving for becoming at-home in the midst of dying American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2000; 17(1): 31 - 43. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Fordham and C. Dowrick Is care of the dying improving? The contribution of specialist and non-specialist to palliative care Fam. Pract., December 1, 1999; 16(6): 573 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Bruera, C. M. Neumann, B. Gagnon, C. Brenneis, P. Kneisler, P. Selmser, and J. Hanson Edmonton Regional Palliative Care Program: impact on patterns of terminal cancer care Can. Med. Assoc. J., August 1, 1999; 161(3): 290 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E K Wilkinson, C Salisbury, N Bosanquet, P J Franks, S Kite, M Lorentzon, and A Naysmith Patient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature review Palliative Medicine, April 1, 1999; 13(3): 197 - 216. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C Salisbury, N Bosanquet, E K Wilkinson, P J Franks, S Kite, M Lorentzon, and A Naysmith The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature review Palliative Medicine, January 1, 1999; 13(1): 3 - 17. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Seale and M. Kelly A comparison of hospice and hospital care for the spouses of people who die Palliative Medicine, March 1, 1997; 11(2): 101 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]