Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byock, I. R
Right arrow Articles by Merriman, M. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Byock, I. R
Right arrow Articles by Merriman, M. P
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring quality of life for patients with terminal illness: the Missoula–VITAS® quality of life index

Ira R Byock

Palliative Care Service, Missoula, Montana

Melanie P Merriman

VITAS Healthcare Corporation, Miami, Florida

Quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome measure in caring for terminally ill patients. The Missoula–VITAS® Quality of Life index (MVQOLI) has been developed to provide a measure of quality of life that is meaningful to both clinicians and patients. Unique features of the instrument include its focus on the terminal phase of life, the item structure and a scoring system that allows the weighting of each dimension of QOL by the respondent, and the subjective wording of the items that allows respondents to interpret the measured elements according to their own experience. The validity and reliability of the patient-reported survey instrument were tested by administering the 25-item questionnaire to 257 patients in 10 communitybased hospices. Participants were incurably ill with predicted survival of six months or less. Exclusion criteria included inability to communicate, dementia, or psychological symptoms that might be intensified by completing the index. Reliability and validity of the new index were examined using standard statistical and psychometric analyses. The MVQOLI demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.77). MVQOLI total scores were correlated with scores on the Multidimensional Quality of Life Scale–Cancer 2 and with patient-reported global QOL ratings. MVQOLI scores did not correlate with observer-rated functional status scores indicating divergent validity. The MVQOLI could be completed by patients of varied educational level, age, functional status, and length of time with a terminal illness. The instrument is designed to contribute to the task of planning care by evaluating patient-identified sources of distress, strength and satisfaction, including issues of life closure. This information contributes to crafting highly specific interventions. Further studies are necessary to determine the usefulness of the instrument in measuring outcomes of end-of-life care in nonhospice settings, and for racial and diagnostic groups under-represented in this sample.

Key Words: palliative care • terminal illness • quality of life • patient-centred • outcomes measurement

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 4, 231-244 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921698670234618


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
B Vivat
Measures of spiritual issues for palliative care patients: a literature review
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2008; 22(7): 859 - 868.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
M. S. Jordhoy, G. Inger Ringdal, J. L. Helbostad, L. Oldervoll, J. H. Loge, and S. Kaasa
Assessing physical functioning: a systematic review of quality of life measures developed for use in palliative care
Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2007; 21(8): 673 - 682.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
E. J. Pearson, J. G Todd, and J. M Futcher
How can occupational therapists measure outcomes in palliative care?
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2007; 21(6): 477 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
J. P. Griffin, K. A. Koch, J. E. Nelson, and M. E. Cooley
Palliative Care Consultation, Quality-of-Life Measurements, and Bereavement for End-of-Life Care in Patients With Lung Cancer: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 404S - 422S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S H Kim, S K u, Y H Yun, C G Lee, Y S Choi, W S Lee, S Y Kim, and D S Heo
Validation study of the Korean version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 441 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
B. Kelly, S. McClement, and H. M. Chochinov
Measurement of psychological distress in palliative care
Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2006; 20(8): 779 - 789.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
D. K. Heyland, P. Dodek, G. Rocker, D. Groll, A. Gafni, D. Pichora, S. Shortt, J. Tranmer, N. Lazar, J. Kutsogiannis, et al.
What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members
Can. Med. Assoc. J., February 28, 2006; 174(5): 627 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
N. Bentur and S. Resnizky
Validation of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in home hospice settings in Israel
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2005; 19(7): 538 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Complementary Health Practice ReviewHome page
A.-l. Williams, P. A. Selwyn, R. McCorkle, S. Molde, L. Liberti, and D. L. Katz
Application of Community-Based Participatory Research Methods to a Study of Complementary Medicine Interventions at End of Life
Complementary Health Practice Review, April 1, 2005; 10(2): 91 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
L. L. Steele, B. Mills, S. R. Hardin, and L. C. Hussey
The quality of life of hospice patients: Patient and provider perceptions
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2005; 22(2): 95 - 110.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Natl Cancer Inst MonogrHome page
M. S. Donaldson
Taking Stock of Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measurement in Oncology Practice in the United States
J Natl Cancer Inst Monographs, October 1, 2004; 2004(33): 155 - 167.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
B. P. Himelstein, J. M. Hilden, A. M. Boldt, and D. Weissman
Pediatric Palliative Care
N. Engl. J. Med., April 22, 2004; 350(17): 1752 - 1762.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
S. R. CONNOR, K. A. EGAN, D. M. KWILOSZ, D. G. LARSON, and D. J. REESE
Interdisciplinary Approaches to Assisting with End-of-life Care and Decision Making
American Behavioral Scientist, November 1, 2002; 46(3): 340 - 356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
V. P. Tilden, S. Tolle, L. Drach, and S. Hickman
Measurement of Quality of Care and Quality of Life at the End of Life
Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(90003): 71 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. W. Stevenson and R. L. Kormos
Mechanical cardiac support 2000: current applications and future trial design: June 15-16, 2000 Bethesda, Maryland
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., January 1, 2001; 37(1): 340 - 370.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
M G. Carson, M. I Fitch, and M. L S Vachon
Measuring patient outcomes in palliative care: a reliability and validity study of the Support Team Assessment Schedule
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 25 - 36.
[Abstract] [PDF]