Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, R. M
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, W. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, R. M
Right arrow Articles by Tierney, W. M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relationships between symptom relief, quality of life, and satisfaction with hospice care

Ryan M Tierney

Samuel M Horton

Terry J Hannan

Calvary Hospital Kogarah, Sydney

William M Tierney

Indiana University, Regenstrief Institute for Health Care and the Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indiana

Hospices were founded to alleviate suffering at the end of life. Quality improvement in hospices should, therefore, target patients' subjective assessments of their care and its outcomes. However, little is known about the relationships among subjective measures of care among hospice patients.

The aim was to assess the relationships between hospice patients' physical and psychological symptoms, quality of life, and satisfaction with inpatient care.

This was achieved with a prospective cohort study of 42 patients admitted to an Australian hospice's inpatient service during a two-month study period. The Edmonton symptom assessment system, McGill quality of life questionnaire, and a new measure of patient satisfaction with hospice inpatient care were used.

It was shown that while there were marked variations in symptoms and quality of life scores, most patients were satisfied with their care. Satisfaction on the day after admission was lower among patients with worse quality of life scores (r = -0.40, P = 0.008), but there was no correlation with symptoms (r = -0.12, P = 0.43). Among the 26 patients (62%) with at least one subsequent inpatient interview, satisfaction was correlated with both worse quality of life (r = -0.51, P = 0.01) and symptoms (r = -0.41, P = 0.05). The symptom, quality of life, and satisfaction scales all had sufficient precision to identify patients with significant changes between the two interviews.

It can be concluded that satisfaction with hospice care was associated with quality of life more than symptoms, although symptoms became important later during inpatient stays. Patients can assess their care and can provide valuable information for improving palliative care.

Key Words: hospices • palliative care • patient satisfaction • quality of life • quality improvement (non-MeSH)

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 5, 333-344 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921698670933919


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
G. K Mitchell
How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2002; 16(6): 457 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
M. Bridge, D. I. Roughton, S. Lewis, J. Barelds, S. Brenton, S. Cotter, M.-L. Hagebols, K. Woolman, M. Annells, and T. Koch
Using caregivers-as-proxies to retrospectively assess and measure quality of dying of palliative care clients
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, May 1, 2002; 19(3): 193 - 199.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
T Morita, S Chihara, and T Kashiwagi
A scale to measure satisfaction of bereaved family receiving inpatient palliative care
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2002; 16(2): 141 - 150.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
L. L. Steele, B. Mills, M. R. Long, and G. A. Hagopian
Patient and caregiver satisfaction with end-of-life care: Does high satisfaction mean high quality of care?
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2002; 19(1): 19 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]