Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, P. M
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edmonds, P. M
Right arrow Articles by Chamberlain, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Do hospital palliative care teams improve symptom control? Use of a modified STAS as an evaluation tool

Polly M Edmonds

Joanna M Stuttaford

Jane Penny

Anna Marie Lynch

St George's Hospital, London

Joe Chamberlain

The support team assessment schedule (STAS) has previously been validated as an evaluation tool for community palliative care teams and inpatient units. This study reports on use of an expanded STAS (E-STAS) to determine symptom prevalence and outcome for inpatients and outpatients referred to a multiprofessional hospital palliative care team.

E-STAS forms were completed on patients at referral and twice weekly thereafter. Between August 1996 and May 1997, 352 patients had one or more E-STAS forms completed; 122 of this group had three or more assessments. One-hundred-and-eighty-two patients were male and 170 were female, the median age was 68.5 years (range 26–101 years) and all but 27 (8%) had malignant disease. Of the symptoms assessed on referral, the most common were psychological distress 93%, anorexia 73%, pain 59%, mouth discomfort 59%, depression 40%, constipation 36%, breathlessness 32%, nausea 24% and vomiting 13%. In the 122 patients where three or more assessments were completed, statistically significant improvements from first to last assessment were seen in all symptoms except depression.

This study suggests that E-STAS may be a useful tool to evaluate interventions by a hospital palliative care team in patients with advanced disease.

Key Words: palliative care • program evaluation • hospitals • terminal care • outcome assessment (health care) • neoplasms

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 5, 345-351 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921698677822456


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S Simon and I. Higginson
Evaluation of hospital palliative care teams: strengths and weaknesses of the before-after study design and strategies to improve it
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
I. Agren Bolmsjo
Review Article: End-of-Life Care for Old People: A Review of the Literature
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, August 1, 2008; 25(4): 328 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
S. Iwase, T. Murakami, Y. Saito, and K. Nakagawa
Preliminary Statistical Assessment of Intervention by a Palliative Care Team Working in a Japanese General Inpatient Unit
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, February 1, 2007; 24(1): 29 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Kirkova, M. P. Davis, D. Walsh, E. Tiernan, N. O'Leary, S. B. LeGrand, R. L. Lagman, and K. M. Russell
Cancer Symptom Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2006; 24(9): 1459 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
B. Jack, V. Hillier, A. Williams, and J. Oldham
Hospital based palliative care teams improve the insight of cancer patients into their disease
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 46 - 52.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
B. Jack, V. Hillier, A. Williams, and J. Oldham
Hospital based palliative care teams improve the symptoms of cancer patients
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2003; 17(6): 498 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
S. D. Weisbord, S. S. Carmody, F. J. Bruns, A. J. Rotondi, L. M. Cohen, M. L. Zeidel, and R. M. Arnold
Symptom burden, quality of life, advance care planning and the potential value of palliative care in severely ill haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2003; 18(7): 1345 - 1352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
M Hotopf, J Chidgey, J Addington-Hall, and K L. Ly
Depression in advanced disease: a systematic review Part 1. Prevalence and case finding
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2002; 16(2): 81 - 97.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
M. P. Davis, D. Walsh, K. Nelson, D. Konrad, and S. B. LeGrand
The business of palliative medicine: Management metrics for an acute-care inpatient unit
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2001; 18(1): 26 - 29.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
P. Edmonds, S. Karlsen, and J. Addington-Hall
Palliative care needs of hospital inpatients
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2000; 14(3): 227 - 228.
[PDF]