Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carter, H.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carter, H.
Right arrow Articles by Green, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Health professionals' responses to multiple sclerosis and motor neurone disease

Helen Carter

Christine McKenna

Roderick MacLeod

Mary Potter Hospice Wellington

Robyn Green

Wellington School of Medicine, Wellington

This study compares the responses of health professionals to multiple sclerosis (MS) and motor neurone disease (MND) in order to determine similarities and variations in responses to the two disorders and the issues critical to caring for patients with these conditions. Health professionals were more negative about MND compared with MS in terms of the amount they felt able to offer patients, their confidence in managing patients and their ability to convey hope. For a number of issues concerning the management of patients, the level of difficulty experienced by health professionals was similar for both MS and MND. These were resource issues, the health professionals' ability to remain positive in the face of progressive disability, interdisciplinary team problems and difficulties regarding patient care. The main concern of health professionals, for both conditions, was the effect of progressive disability on the patient. For MND, management issues which health professionals found comparatively more difficult than for MS were patients' short prognosis and impending death, communication problems and progressive disability. Issues which were comparatively more difficult for MS than MND were changes in patients' affect, cognition and personality, problems with planning care because of the disorder's unpredictable course, problems with diagnosis such as making and disclosing the diagnosis, and the tendency for patients to be difficult or demanding. Some notable differences in responses between health professionals in different health care settings were found. The findings have implications for changing health professionals' conceptualization of ‘hope’, developing ways of improving communication between health professionals in different health care settings so as to enable them to learn from each other's expertise and experiences and redressing gaps in service provision, especially for young people with MS.

Key Words: hope (non-MeSH) • delivery of health care, integrated • palliative care • patient care planning • multiple sclerosis • motor neurone disease

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 5, 383-394 (1998)
DOI: 10.1191/026921698668830097
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Qual Health ResHome page
S. Thorne, A. Con, L. McGuinness, G. McPherson, and S. R. Harris
Health Care Communication Issues in Multiple Sclerosis: An Interpretive Description
Qual Health Res, January 1, 2004; 14(1): 5 - 22.
[Abstract] [PDF]