This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wiles, R. Articles by Jarrett, N. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wiles, R. Articles by Jarrett, N. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Palliative Care Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Improving palliative care services: a pragmatic model for evaluating services and assessing unmet need

Sheila Payne

Health Research Unit, School of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, University of Southampton, Southampton

Nicola Jarrett

Evaluating local palliative care services and identifying gaps in services for patients are crucial to the development of services which enable people to die at home in a well-supported environment. A review of the local strategy for providing respite and support services for palliative care patients and their carers was carried out in one area of south-east England. The review comprised four elements: identification of services available; interviews with provider ‘stakeholders’; interviews with patients and carers; questionnaire survey of general practitioners and district nurses. The findings and outcome are described. It is suggested that this approach could be adopted by health authorities to form one part of a comprehensive system of needs assessment. Alternatively, it could be used by groups of providers to evaluate existing services and to identify potential improvements to services. Advantages and disadvantages of the approach for both commissioners of such reviews and those carrying them out are discussed.

Key Words: health planning • health services • home care services • palliative care • programme evaluation • utilization review

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 2, 131-137 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921699674460441


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Hiatt, C. Stelle, M. Mulsow, and J. Pearson Scott The Importance of Perspective: Evaluation of Hospice Care From Multiple Stakeholders American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, November 1, 2007; 24(5): 376 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C Ingleton, S Payne, M Nolan, and I Carey Respite in palliative care: a review and discussion of the literature Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2003; 17(7): 567 - 575. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Lloyd-Williams and Y. H Carter General practice vocational training in the UK: what teaching is given in palliative care? Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2003; 17(7): 616 - 620. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S Payne, F Sheldon, N Jarrett, P Smith, C L Davis, P Turner, and S George Differences in understanding of specialist palliative care amongst service providers and commissioners in South London Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2002; 16(5): 395 - 402. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Payne The role of volunteers in hospice bereavement support in New Zealand Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2001; 15(2): 107 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF]