Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lecouturier, J.
Right arrow Articles by Eccles, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lecouturier, J.
Right arrow Articles by Eccles, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer
*Caregivers
*Palliative Care
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Lay carers' satisfaction with community palliative care: results of a postal survey

Jan Lecouturier

Ann Jacoby

Centre for Health Services Research, 21 Claremont Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA, UK ann.jacoby{at}ncl.ac.uk

Colin Bradshaw

Tim Lovel

Martin Eccles

This paper reports the substantive findings of a study that examined the feasibility of using postal questionnaires to assess the satisfaction of lay caregivers with the care received in the community by those dying of cancer. The focus of the analysis was the quality of information provided by health professionals, health services used in the final year of the dying person's life and the lay carer's views about the quality of these services. The study was a retrospective survey of lay carers identified from death certificates over a 9-month period. Of the 355 people contacted, 156 completed the questionnaires, a 44% response rate.

The results of the survey indicate that information provision was deemed unsatisfactory by a large proportion of respondents, and that dissatisfaction with care received from hospital, the district nursing service and the general practitioner was common. Levels of satisfaction with care were clearly related to a range of service factors. Our survey also highlighted clear differences in the perceived quality of specialist and generic services for those dying of cancer. A comparison of the findings from this postal study with those reported in earlier retrospective interview surveys of lay carers suggests that the use of the postal questionnaire is a valid and cost-effective approach for assessing quality of care. The data provide baseline information against which improvements in the quality of care can be measured.

Key Words: caregivers • community health services • health care surveys • neoplasms • patient satisfaction • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 275-283 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921699667368640


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Munday, M. Petrova, and J. Dale
Exploring preferences for place of death with terminally ill patients: qualitative study of experiences of general practitioners and community nurses in England
BMJ, July 15, 2009; 339(jul15_1): b2391 - b2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
A. Docherty, A. Owens, M. Asadi-Lari, R. Petchey, J. Williams, and Y. H Carter
Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2008; 22(2): 153 - 171.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Clin Nurs ResHome page
P. Voutilainen, K. Backman, A. Isola, and H. Laukkala
Family Members' Perceptions of the Quality of Long-Term Care
Clin Nurs Res, May 1, 2006; 15(2): 135 - 149.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
G. K Mitchell
How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2002; 16(6): 457 - 464.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
R. Horton
Differences in assessment of symptoms and quality of life between patients with advanced cancer and their specialist palliative care nurses in a home care setting
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2002; 16(6): 488 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
T Morita, S Chihara, and T Kashiwagi
Family satisfaction with inpatient palliative care in Japan
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2002; 16(3): 185 - 193.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
A. Jacoby, J. Lecouturier, C. Bradshaw, T. Lovel, and M. Eccles
Feasibility of using postal questionnaires to examine carer satisfaction with palliative care: a methodological assessment
Palliative Medicine, June 1, 1999; 13(4): 285 - 298.
[Abstract] [PDF]