Palliative Medicine

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nekolaichuk, C. L
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, T. O
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nekolaichuk, C. L
Right arrow Articles by Maguire, T. O
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Palliative Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 4, 311-323 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/026921699675854885

A comparison of patient and proxy symptom assessments in advanced cancer patients

Cheryl L Nekolaichuk

Eduardo Bruera

Kathy Spachynski

Tara MacEachern

Division of Palliative Care Medicine, Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

John Hanson

Department of Medicine, Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

Thomas O Maguire

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

The purpose of this study was to compare patient and proxy (physician and nurse) assessments of symptoms in advanced cancer patients. The sample consisted of 49 patients with advanced cancer admitted to an acute palliative care unit. Three independent assessments were completed for each patient on two occasions within 11 days of admission. On each occasion, symptoms were rated independently by the patient and two proxies (treating physician and nurse), using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). The ESAS is a nine-item visual analogue scale (VAS) for assessing pain, activity, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, appetite, well-being and shortness of breath. Symptom ratings were compared using a repeated-measures ANOVA procedure and correlations. Average physician ratings were generally lower than average patient ratings for both occasions. Average nurse ratings agreed more closely with patient ratings, with a trend towards lower ratings on occasion 1 and higher ratings on occasion 2. There was a significant rater (person rating the effects) effect (P < 0.01) for three of the nine symptoms: physicians rated drowsiness, shortness of breath and pain significantly lower than patients. For drowsiness and shortness of breath, these differences were clinically relevant, representing a difference of more than 12 mm on a 100-mm VAS. The accuracy of assessments amongst those rating the symptoms did not improve over time. Proxy assessments of symptom intensity, particularly by physicians, were significantly lower than patient assessments for three of the nine symptoms. Further research regarding the reliability of patient and proxy assessments is needed to assess and manage symptoms in advanced cancer effectively.

Key Words: neoplasms • outcome assessment (health care) • palliative care


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C. Nekolaichuk, S. Watanabe, and C. Beaumont
The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: a 15-year retrospective review of validation studies (1991-2006)
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2008; 22(2): 111 - 122.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
M. van den Beuken-van Everdingen, J. de Rijke, A. Kessels, H. Schouten, M van Kleef, and J Patijn
Prevalence of pain in patients with cancer: a systematic review of the past 40 years
Ann. Onc., September 1, 2007; 18(9): 1437 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S. Dorman, A. Byrne, and A. Edwards
Which measurement scales should we use to measure breathlessness in palliative care? A systematic review
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2007; 21(3): 177 - 191.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Kirkova, M. P. Davis, D. Walsh, E. Tiernan, N. O'Leary, S. B. LeGrand, R. L. Lagman, and K. M. Russell
Cancer Symptom Assessment Instruments: A Systematic Review
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2006; 24(9): 1459 - 1473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
K. Oi-Ling, D. T. Man-Wah, and D. N. Kam-Hung
Symptom distress as rated by advanced cancer patients, caregivers and physicians in the last week of life
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2005; 19(3): 228 - 233.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
A. L. Snow, K. J. O'Malley, M. Cody, M. E. Kunik, C. M. Ashton, C. Beck, E. Bruera, and D. Novy
A Conceptual Model of Pain Assessment for Noncommunicative Persons With Dementia
Gerontologist, December 1, 2004; 44(6): 807 - 817.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
L. J. Patrick-Miller
Is There a Role for the Assessment of Health-related Quality of Life in the Clinical Evaluation of Novel Cytostatic Agents?: Commentary re: P. M. LoRusso, Improvements in Quality of Life and Disease-related Symptoms in Phase I Trials of the Selective Oral Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor ZD1839 in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors. Clin. Cancer Res., 9: 2040-2048, 2003.
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 9(6): 1990 - 1994.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
L. K. George
Research Design in End-of-Life Research: State of Science
Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(90003): 86 - 98.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
R. Horton
Differences in assessment of symptoms and quality of life between patients with advanced cancer and their specialist palliative care nurses in a home care setting
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2002; 16(6): 488 - 494.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
D. Tassinari, I. Panzini, A. Ravaioli, M. Maltoni, S. Sartori, M. S. Jordhoy, S. Kaasa, J. H. Loge, and P. Fayers
Quality of Life at the End of Life: How Is the Solution Far Away?
J. Clin. Oncol., March 15, 2002; 20(6): 1704 - 1705.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. Addington-Hall and L. Kalra
Measuring quality of life: Who should measure quality of life?
BMJ, June 9, 2001; 322(7299): 1417 - 1420.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
P. Costello, J. Wiseman, I. Douglas, B. Batten, and M. Bennett
Assessing hospice inpatients with pain using numerical rating scales
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2001; 15(3): 257 - 258.
[PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
R M Pickering
Describing the subjects in a study
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2001; 15(1): 69 - 75.
[PDF]