Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krishnasamy, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krishnasamy, M.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Lung Cancer
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Perceptions of health care need in lung cancer. Can prospective surveys provide nationally representative data?

Meinir Krishnasamy

Macmillan Practice Development Unit, Centre for Cancer and Palliative Care Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Trust, London

This paper considers the potential of a prospective questionnaire survey to provide nationally representative data of perceptions of health care need. The paper focuses on methodological problems encountered during the study, reserving the discussion of key findings to further publications. Data were gathered from patients with lung cancer, lay carers and professionals from 24 randomly selected hospitals throughout the UK. A number of factors had an impact on the survey's potential to provide nationally representative data. These included an unanticipatedly high death rate of patients registered in hospitals as being in receipt of treatment or follow-up care. Of a potential sample of 785 patients identified as being alive by the participating hospitals prior to data collection, 319 (41%) were found to have died after checking with general practitioner surgeries. As a consequence of consultants declining to participate, or where they did not reply to any correspondence, eight hospitals were withdrawn from the study on the grounds of inability to gain access to a representative sample of patients. In conclusion, a retrospective design, supplemented by the views of patients would have ensured greater success in terms of patient response rate (45%) and representativeness of data. Nevertheless, the survey represents a first attempt at undertaking a national assessment of patients with lung cancer and has provided rich data drawn from patients' experiences of living with a diagnosis of lung cancer and its treatment.

Key Words: lung cancer • needs assessment • palliative care • prospective surveys

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 14, No. 5, 410-418 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/026921600701536246


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
M. Kendall, F. Harris, K. Boyd, A. Sheikh, S. A Murray, D. Brown, I. Mallinson, N. Kearney, and A. Worth
Key challenges and ways forward in researching the "good death": qualitative in-depth interview and focus group study
BMJ, March 10, 2007; 334(7592): 521 - 521.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
M. Krishnasamy, E. Wilkie, and J. Haviland
Lung cancer health care needs assessment: patients' and informal carers' responses to a national mail questionnaire survey
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2001; 15(3): 213 - 227.
[Abstract] [PDF]