This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Morita, T. Articles by Oka, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Morita, T. Articles by Oka, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Communication Capacity Scale and Agitation Distress Scale to measure the severity of delirium in terminally ill cancer patients: a validation study

Junichi Tsunoda

Satoshi Inoue

Satoshi Chihara

Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka

Kiyoshi Oka

Department of Psychiatry, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka

Although valid measurement of the severity of terminal delirium is of great importance in palliative care settings, existing instruments have considerable limitations. In order to quantify patients' communication capacity and agitated behaviour, two new operational observer-rating scales, the Communication Capacity Scale (Communication Scale) and Agitation Distress Scale (Agitation Scale), were validated.

Thirty terminally ill cancer patients diagnosed with delirium were evaluated simultaneously by two palliative care physicians blinded to each other's coding using the Communication Scale and Agitation Scale. In addition, the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS), Delirium Rating Scale (DRS) and Sedation Scale were rated by one researcher. Both scales achieved high internal consistency and inter-rater reliability with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.91 and 0.96, and Cohen's kappa values on each item of 0.72–1.00.

The principal components analysis resulted in the emergence of only one component for each scale. The total score on the Communication Scale was highly associated with that of the MDAS (= 0.78), Sedation Scale (= 0.86), and cognitive items from the MDAS and DRS (= 0.83). The whole score on the Agitation Scale was significantly correlated with that of the DRS (= 0.61) and agitation items from the MDAS and DRS (= 0.61).

In conclusion, the Communication Scale and Agitation Scale have acceptable reliability and validity to quantify patients' communication capacity and agitation symptoms of terminally ill cancer patients with delirium.

Key Words: delirium • neoplasms • palliative care • measurement

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 3, 197-206 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921601678576185


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Harris Delirium in advanced disease Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2007; 83(982): 525 - 528. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Kelly, S. McClement, and H. M. Chochinov Measurement of psychological distress in palliative care Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2006; 20(8): 779 - 789. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. Morita, I. Hyodo, T. Yoshimi, M. Ikenaga, Y. Tamura, A. Yoshizawa, A. Shimada, T. Akechi, M. Miyashita, I. Adachi, et al. Association between hydration volume and symptoms in terminally ill cancer patients with abdominal malignancies Ann. Onc., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 640 - 647. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J Hjermstad, J. H Loge, and S. Kaasa Methods for assessment of cognitive failure and delirium in palliative care patients: implications for practice and research Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2004; 18(6): 494 - 506. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Centeno, A. Sanz, and E. Bruera Delirium in advanced cancer patients Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2004; 18(3): 184 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Vella-Brincat and A D Macleod Haloperidol in palliative care Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2004; 18(3): 195 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]