Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Radbruch, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, K. A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Radbruch, L.
Right arrow Articles by Lehmann, K. A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Transdermal fentanyl for the management of cancer pain: a survey of 1005 patients

Lukas Radbruch

Rainer Sabatowski

Frank Petzke

Anke Brunsch-Radbruch

Stefan Grond

Klaus A Lehmann

Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Cologne

Transdermal fentanyl was released in Germany in 1995. From October 1996 to February 1998 transdermal treatment was documented for 1005 patients (506 men and 499 women with a mean age of 60 years, range 20–92 years) with chronic pain in an open survey including 290 physicians from hospitals and general practitioners throughout Germany. Most patients suffered from cancer pain and only 11 patients had chronic pain from non-malignant disease. Physicians were asked to complete a questionnaire for patients treated with transdermal fentanyl on initiation of therapy (day 0), and days 3, 6, 18, 30 thereafter, followed by monthly follow-up intervals. Patients were asked to complete a pain diary. Transdermal therapy was documented from day 0 for 824 patients, while 181 patients had been treated with transdermal fentanyl before admission in the survey. Most of the other 824 patients had been treated with other step 3 opioids (55% of the patients) or step 2 opioids (23%) before conversion to transdermal fentanyl, whereas 8% had been treated only with non-opioids and 14% had received analgesics only as required or not at all before initiation of transdermal therapy. The most important reasons for switching to transdermal opioid therapy were insufficient pain relief with the previous medication followed by a variety of gastrointestinal symptoms impeding oral analgesic therapy. Initial fentanyl doses ranged from 0.6 to 9.6 mg/day (25 to 400 [.mu]g/h) with a median of 1.2 mg/day (50 [.mu]g/h). Median doses slowly increased throughout the observation period to 2.4 mg/day (100 [.mu]g/h) after 4 months of treatment. Most patients continued transdermal therapy until the time of death (47% of patients). Other reasons for discontinuation were inadequate pain relief (10%), pain relief with other analgesic regimens (10%), other symptoms than pain (5%), rejection of transdermal therapy by the patient (6%) or miscellaneous (16%). Adverse events were documented as the reason for discontinuation of transdermal therapy in 49 patients (5%). Dyspnoea was documented for seven patients as the reason for discontinuation. One of these patients, as well as another patient with an episode of apnoea, had to be treated with artificial respiration for several hours, but both patients recovered without sequelae.

Transdermal therapy with fentanyl was safe and efficient in this national survey. Transdermal fentanyl can be recommended for treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain and probably may even be used as a first-line drug on step 3 of the World Health Organization recommendations in selected patient groups.

Key Words: cancer pain • opioid therapy • transdermal fentanyl • safety

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 4, 309-321 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921601678320296


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
C. Quigley
The role of opioids in cancer pain
BMJ, October 8, 2005; 331(7520): 825 - 829.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DTBHome page
Opioid analgesics for cancer pain in primary care
DTB, February 1, 2005; 43(2): 9 - 12.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
J. Botterman, C. De Meester, and K. Eeckhaut
Transdermal fentanyl: caution in the use of high doses
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2004; 18(7): 663 - 663.
[PDF]


Home page
J Am Board Fam MedHome page
S. Menahem and P. Shvartzman
High-Dose Fentanyl Patch for Cancer Pain
J Am Board Fam Med, September 1, 2004; 17(5): 388 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C. Regnard and A. Pelham
Severe respiratory depression and sedation with transdermal fentanyl: four case studies
Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2003; 17(8): 714 - 716.
[PDF]