Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yardley, S J
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yardley, S J
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, F
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Lung Cancer
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Receiving a diagnosis of lung cancer: patients' interpretations, perceptions and perspectives

S J Yardley

C L Davis

Countess Mountbatten House, Moorgreen Hospital, Southampton

F Sheldon

Department of Social Work Studies, University of Southampton Highfield, Southampton

Lung cancer has a higher incidence than any other type of cancer and more than 80% of sufferers die within a year of diagnosis. An important aspect of caring for cancer patients is the breaking of bad news, something that most doctors admit to having difficulty with. Only a few publications on this issue adopt the patients' perspective. This study aimed to document patients' views on delivery of lung cancer diagnoses, their attitudes to methods used and ideas for improvement.

Patients were selected from medical, surgical and general practitioner clinics to provide insight into patients' perceptions of care in different environments. Those who gave informed consent completed a taped semi-structured interview. Transcripts were analysed qualitatively using a phenomenological approach. Recruitment was stopped when saturation was reached: no new themes were being identified. A summary of results was sent to patients, whenever possible, for their comment. An independent researcher coded four transcripts to establish the degree of inter-rater reliability.

Thirteen patients were recruited. There were five key areas: communication (including the use of words such as ‘tumour' and ‘growth'), family/community issues, reaction to diagnosis, views on treatment and prognosis (all of which were very variable), and suggested improvements (e.g. a clearer explanation of the experience of bronchoscopy in the patient information leaflet, PIL). Inter-rater reliability was good. The PIL is being revised.

Factors including family situation and personal experience of illness vary greatly and yet they influence patients' reactions to receiving a diagnosis of lung cancer, their interpretation of this and their attitudes to the illness and treatment. These findings underline the need to continue to develop lung cancer services that can provide quality care tailored to each patient.

Key Words: lung cancer/neoplasms • patient's perceptions • communication • bad news • truth disclosures

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 5, 379-386 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921601680419429


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
J. Jansen, P. N. Butow, J. C.M. van Weert, S. van Dulmen, R. J. Devine, T. J. Heeren, J. M. Bensing, and M. H.N. Tattersall
Does Age Really Matter? Recall of Information Presented to Newly Referred Patients With Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2008; 26(33): 5450 - 5457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. A. Socinski, R. Crowell, T. E. Hensing, C. J. Langer, R. Lilenbaum, A. B. Sandler, and D. Morris
Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Stage IV: ACCP Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (2nd Edition)
Chest, September 1, 2007; 132(3_suppl): 277S - 289S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
I Plu, G Moutel, I Purssell-Francois, N Lapidus, F Ellien, C Manaouil, and C Herve
Ethical issues arising from the requirement to provide written information in palliative care
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 55 - 57.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qualitative InquiryHome page
M. Kendall and S. A. Murray
Tales of the Unexpected: Patients' Poetic Accounts of the Journey to a Diagnosis of Lung Cancer: A Prospective Serial Qualitative Interview Study
Qualitative Inquiry, October 1, 2005; 11(5): 733 - 751.
[Abstract] [PDF]