Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lo, R. S K
Right arrow Articles by Mak, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lo, R. S K
Right arrow Articles by Mak, Y.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Cross-cultural validation of the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese

Raymond S K Lo

Palliative Care Unit, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Shatin Hospital, Hong Kong

Jean Woo

Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, Shatin Hospital, Hong Kong

Karen C H Zhoc

Charlotte Y P Li

Palliative Care Unit, Shatin Hospital, Hong Kong

Winnie Yeo

Philip Johnson

Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Hong Kong

Yvonne Mak

Bradbury Hospice, Hong Kong and Joseph Lee Hospital Chief Executive, Bradbury Hospice, Hong Kong

The main focus of palliative care services is to improve patients' quality of life (QOL). The potential value of assessment of QOL in palliative care is being increasingly recognized. The McGill Quality of Life questionnaire (MQOL) is designed specifically for palliative care patients, but its cross-cultural validity needs to be determined before it can be applied in populations of different cultures and ethnic groups. The cross-cultural validity of MQOL was investigated using a translated and modified version in Chinese–the MQOL-HK–in 462 palliative care patients in Hong Kong. Results show that the MQOL-HK is acceptable, valid and reliable. There is good acceptability, construct validity, convergent and divergent validity, test–retest and inter-rater reliability. Our study confirms that QOL does have cross-culturally robust constructs. Principal components analysis shows that the domains of physical, psychological, existential and support are all relevant and applicable in Chinese culture. Multiple regression analysis reveals that existential domain is the most important domain in predicting overall QOL. ‘Face', eating and sex are additional facets of QOL that also need to be considered. The worst physical symptom on admission is the item of QOL with the lowest score, which need more care and attention by palliative care workers. A cross-culturally validated QOL instrument cannot just help ensure an accurate evaluation of profile, determinants, and changes of QOL, but is also a valuable asset for future comparison and evaluation of palliative care services and interventions across the world.

Key Words: quality of life • palliative care • hospice culture • validation • end of life • Hong Kong

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 15, No. 5, 387-397 (2001)
DOI: 10.1191/026921601680419438
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
M. Tsujikawa, K. Yokoyama, K. Urakawa, and K. Onishi
Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire assessed by application in palliative care wards
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2009; 23(7): 659 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
M Henry, L. Huang, M. Ferland, J Mitchell, and S. Cohen
Continued study of the psychometric properties of the McGill quality of life questionnaire
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2008; 22(6): 718 - 723.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
S H Kim, S K u, Y H Yun, C G Lee, Y S Choi, W S Lee, S Y Kim, and D S Heo
Validation study of the Korean version of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 441 - 447.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Chronic IllnessHome page
K. A. O'Connell and S. M. Skevington
To measure or not to measure? Reviewing the assessment of spirituality and religion in health-related quality of life
Chronic Illness, March 1, 2007; 3(1): 77 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
N. Bentur and S. Resnizky
Validation of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in home hospice settings in Israel
Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2005; 19(7): 538 - 544.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
C. D Blinderman and N. I Cherny
Existential issues do not necessarily result in existential suffering: lessons from cancer patients in Israel
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2005; 19(5): 371 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 ChestHome page
S. L. Chan, M. M. Chan-Yeung, G. C. Ooi, C. L. Lam, T. F. Cheung, W. K. Lam, and K. W. Tsang
Validation of the Hong Kong Chinese Version of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire in Patients With Bronchiectasis
Chest, December 1, 2002; 122(6): 2030 - 2037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Palliat MedHome page
R M Pickering
Statistical aspects of measurement in palliative care
Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2002; 16(4): 359 - 364.
[PDF]