This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Seymour, J Articles by Marples, R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seymour, J Articles by Marples, R Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Palliative Care Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Palliative care and policy in England: a review of health improvement plans for 1999–2003

Trent Palliative Care Centre, Little Common Lane, Sheffield S11 9NE, UKj.e.seymour{at}sheffield.ac.uk

D Clark

Medical Sociology, Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sheffield

R Marples

Sheffield Palliative Care Studies Group, The University of Sheffield and Trent Palliative Care Centre, Sheffield

Since 1987 health authorities in England have been required to make plans for palliative care provision, but their record in doing so has been patchy. The production of health improvement plans (HImPs), in which each health authority must set out its priorities and actions designed to improve the health and well-being of its local population, provides an opportunity to examine the extent to which palliative care provision in the NHS is regarded as a priority by policy makers in England. This paper reports on a structured documentary review of the HImPs published by the 99 health authorities in England. The review indicates that at the moment, in spite of the longstanding duty placed on health authorities to develop strategic plans for palliative care and to assess the level of local palliative care needs, not all have made significant progress in this direction. Among those that do have plans for palliative care, the vast majority of these plans are for people with cancer. What emerges most clearly is a sense in which specialist palliative care, especially for non-cancer patients, is perceived as an ‘optional extra’ by many health authorities rather than an integral and essential part of the overall supportive care strategy which they clearly are at pains to develop.

Key Words: England • health improvement plans • health policy • palliative care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, 5-11 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm521oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S Kennedy, J Seymour, K Almack, and K Cox Key stakeholders' experiences and views of the NHS End of Life Care Programme: findings from a national evaluation Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2009; 23(4): 283 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF]