This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rawlinson, F Articles by Finlay, I Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rawlinson, F Articles by Finlay, I Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Assessing education in palliative medicine: development of a tool based on the Association for Palliative Medicine core curriculum

I Finlay

Academic Section of Palliative Medicine, University of Wales College of Medicine, Velindre Hospital, Cardiff CF14 2TL

The Association for Palliative Medicine (APM) of Great Britain and Ireland has developed a core curriculum for palliative medicine. To establish the appropriateness of this core curriculum as a standard against which training can be measured, we have examined how doctors from different medical, social and cultural backgrounds view its various elements. In 1998, we succeededin tracing 304 of 390 doctors, past students of the University of Wales College of Medicine's Diploma in Palliative Medicine. Each was sent a postal questionnaire that asked them to rate the importance to their own clinical practice of each element of the APM core curriculum. Two-hundred sixty-three questionnaires were returned a response rate of 87%. The ages rangedfrom 30 to 71 (mean 44) years; 56% (147) were female. Forty per cent (105) were general practitioners, and 37% (97) hospice and 23% (61) hospital-based. Eighty-three per cent (220) were fromthe UK, 5% (14) from the rest of Europe, 8% (21) from the Far East and 3% (8) from other countries. The majority of respondents agreed that all elements of the APM core curriculum were of ‘very great' or ‘great' importance to their current clinical practice. Respondents' medical, social or cultural setting had only very minor effects on their attitude to individual elements. The elements of the curriculum perceived as being of greatest importance were: communication with patients and their families, assessment, diagnosis and treatment of pain, multiprofessional team working and psychological responses to illness and bereavement. Clinicians from a wide variety of backgrounds confirm the relevance of the APM core curriculum. This justifies its adoption as the audit standard against which the quality of training and educational programmes in Palliative Medicine should be judged.

Key Words: audit • education • palliative care • research • training

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 1, 51-55 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm508oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Haugen and T Vejlgaard The Nordic Specialist Course in Palliative Medicine: evaluation and experiences from the first course 2003-2005 Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2008; 22(3): 256 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Jack, V. Hillier, A. Williams, and J. Oldham Hospital based palliative care teams improve the insight of cancer patients into their disease Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 46 - 52. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Jack, V. Hillier, A. Williams, and J. Oldham Hospital based palliative care teams improve the symptoms of cancer patients Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2003; 17(6): 498 - 502. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P M Fayers, M S Jordhuy, and S Kaasa Cluster-randomized trials Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2002; 16(1): 69 - 70. [PDF]