Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morita, T
Right arrow Articles by Kashiwagi, T
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morita, T
Right arrow Articles by Kashiwagi, T
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A scale to measure satisfaction of bereaved family receiving inpatient palliative care

T Morita

S Chihara

Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Osaka

T Kashiwagi

Graduate School of Human Science, Osaka University, Osaka

Although satisfaction is an important outcome of medical care, there are no validated tools to quantify family satisfaction with hospital-based palliative care. In this nationwide postal survey, an instrument to measure informal carer satisfaction with an inpatient palliative care service was validated. A 60-item questionnaire was mailed to 1344 bereaved people who had lost their family members at 50 palliative care units in Japan, and 850 responses were analysed (response rate=64%). The reliability, construct validity, and convergent validity of the scale were examined after the responses were randomly divided into two groups: a training set used in the development phase (n=500) and a testing set used in the validation phase (n=350). The number of scale items was reduced from 50 to 34 through psychometric techniques in the development phase. In the testing sample, the overall Cronbach's coefficient alpha for the final 34-item scale was 0.98. A factor analysis revealed that the scale consisted of seven subcategories: Nursing Care, Facility, Information, Availability, Family Care, Cost, and Symptom Palliation. The total score of the scale was significantly correlated with the degree of global satisfaction of the bereaved (Spearman's r=0.78). In conclusion, this 34-item scale, the Satisfaction Scale for Family Members Receiving Inpatient Palliative Care (Sat-Fam-IPC), has acceptable psychometric properties and would be a useful tool to measure carer satisfaction with an inpatient palliative care service.

Key Words: measurement • palliative care • psychometry • satisfaction

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 2, 141-150 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm514oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
M. Miyashita, T. Morita, and K. Hirai
Evaluation of End-of-Life Cancer Care From the Perspective of Bereaved Family Members: The Japanese Experience
J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2008; 26(23): 3845 - 3852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
M. Miyashita, T. Morita, S. Tsuneto, K. Sato, and Y. Shima
The Japan HOspice and Palliative Care Evaluation Study (J-HOPE Study): Study Design and Characteristics of Participating Institutions
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2008; 25(3): 223 - 232.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C. Mayland, E. Williams, and J. Ellershaw
How well do current instruments using bereaved relatives' views evaluate care for dying patients?
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2008; 22(2): 133 - 144.
[Abstract] [PDF]