This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cornbleet, M. A Articles by Bond, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cornbleet, M. A Articles by Bond, S. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cancer Palliative Care Personal Medical Records Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Patient-held records in cancer and palliative care: a randomized, prospective trial

Marie Curie Centre, Edinburgh, Scotland

Phyllis Campbell

North Glasgow University Hospitals NHS Trust, Glasgow, Scotland

Scott Murray

University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland

Margaret Stevenson

Scottish Partnership Agency for Palliative and Cancer Care, Eidinburgh

Senga Bond

University of Newcastle, Newcastle

Objectives: To evaluate prospectively the introduction of a patient-held record (PHR) in the management of patients with advanced cancer and palliative care needs. Design: a) A prospective, parallel group, randomized controlled trial. b) A postal survey of the opinions of health professionals whose patients had a PHR. Setting: Out-patient oncology centres in Glasgow and Edinburgh, hospice home-care services across the central belt in Scotland. Participants: A total of 244 patients with advanced cancer recruited either from oncology out-patient clinics or hospice home-care services. The baseline interview was completed by 231 patients and 117 were randomized to receive the PHR. Between 4 and 6 months later, 80 patients with the PHR and 97 without were interviewed. Of the 83 health professionals caring for patients known to have received the PHR 63 replied to a postal questionnaire. Main outcome measures: Subjective views of patient satisfaction with communication and perception of communication between patient and health care professionals as determined by structured interview at baseline and after 4– 6 months. Results: We could identify no improvement in the provision of information to patients, or patients' satisfaction with information provided by out-patient doctors, GPs, practice and community nurses and hospice or palliative home care staff. Overall, patients' perception of communication between all staff involved in their care with and without PHRs was excellent in 24% and 21%, respectively, or very good in 56% and 58% (P=0.89). The PHR made no difference to information passing between health professionals, or to the degree of family involvement. Most of those who had a record found it of some use and benefit. Conclusion: This study provides no evidence on which to base the widespread promotion of PHRs, although local projects with committed clinicians and patients may well prove popular and effective.

Key Words: palliative cancer care • patient-held records

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 3, 205-212 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm541oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. E. Mills, L. J. Murray, B. T. Johnston, C. Cardwell, and M. Donnelly Does a Patient-Held Quality-of-Life Diary Benefit Patients With Inoperable Lung Cancer? J. Clin. Oncol., January 1, 2009; 27(1): 70 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. C. Kaelber, A. K. Jha, D. Johnston, B. Middleton, and D. W. Bates A Research Agenda for Personal Health Records (PHRs) J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2008; 15(6): 729 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Laugharne and C. Henderson Medical records: Patient-held records in mental health Psychiatr. Bull., February 1, 2004; 28(2): 51 - 52. [Full Text] [PDF]