This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stephenson, J Articles by Gilbert, J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stephenson, J Articles by Gilbert, J Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The development of clinical guidelines on paracentesis for ascites related to malignancy

Derriford Hospital and St. Luke's Hospice, Plymouth

J Gilbert

Exeter and District Hospice and Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter

Malignancy-related ascites gives rise to troublesome symptoms and carries a poor prognosis. Abdominal paracentesis is a widely used and effective procedure for symptom relief, but practice with regard to the procedure itself may vary considerably. Evidence obtained in the context of liver disease probably influences practice in malignancy, although the pathophysiology involved is different. Anecdotal evidence suggested a difference in practice between the Exeter and District Hospice and the adjoining hospital, and this was confirmed by a review of case notes. Patients undergoing paracentesis in the hospital were more likely to have prior ultrasound assessment and to be given intravenous fluids, and had longer drainage times and longer inpatient stays. It seemed that some practices were placing unnecessary burdens on patients whose life expectancy was short. A set of clinical guidelines for the procedure was drawn up, based on the limited evidence available and the practice within the hospice. These guidelines emphasise performing ultrasound investigations only in cases of diagnostic uncertainty, allowing up to 5 L of fluid to drain without clamping, leaving drains in for no more than 6 h and giving intravenous fluids only when specifically indicated. These guidelines were introduced on the oncology ward of the adjoining hospital. The impact on practice was assessed by means of a retrospective case note review of all procedures carried out on the ward in the 6 months before and after the guidelines were introduced. The introduction of guidelines resulted in significant reductions in prior ultrasound assessment, mean length of time drains were left in and mean length of inpatient stay for planned procedures. There were no cases of symptomatic hypotension in the postguidelines group.

Key Words: ascites • guidelines • malignancy • paracentesis • palliative care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 3, 213-218 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm509oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. WIMBERGER, M. HEUBNER, H. LINDHOFER, M. JAGER, R. KIMMIG, and S. KASIMIR-BAUER Influence of Catumaxomab on Tumor Cells in Bone Marrow and Blood in Ovarian Cancer Anticancer Res, May 1, 2009; 29(5): 1787 - 1791. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Burges, P. Wimberger, C. Kumper, V. Gorbounova, H. Sommer, B. Schmalfeldt, J. Pfisterer, M. Lichinitser, A. Makhson, V. Moiseyenko, et al. Effective Relief of Malignant Ascites in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer by a Trifunctional Anti-EpCAM x Anti-CD3 Antibody: A Phase I/II Study Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 13(13): 3899 - 3905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lee and L. T. Neng Letter to the Editor Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2003; 17(4): 378 - 378. [PDF]

				J. Stephenson and J. Gilbert A reply Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2003; 17(4): 379 - 379. [PDF]