Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, M
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Farquhar, M
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Defining patients as palliative: hospital doctors' versus general practitioners' perceptions

M Farquhar

G Grande

C Todd

S Barclay

Health Services Research Group, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge

There appears to be a lack of consensus on the classification of individual patients as ‘for palliative care’, although the extent of this is unknown. General practitioners (GPs) of 213 patients with a palliative diagnosis of lung or colo-rectal cancer were sent a one-page questionnaire to assess information sent by hospital doctors, and to establish the GPs' perception of patients' palliative status. A total of 185 questionnaires were returned (87% response rate). Of those GPs receiving information from the hospital, one in four rated the adequacy as less than positive; 26% reportedly received no information or received it ‘too late’. In 20% of cases, GPs did not perceive patients as palliative, although hospital records suggested that they were, and death certificates received later potentially confirmed this. There was, however, no significant difference between GPs allocating a patient to palliative status or not, in terms of the promptness or adequacy of information received from the hospital, as rated by the GP. There was a significant difference in survival between patients whom GPs perceived as for palliative care and those they did not (‘palliative’ patients died, on average, 117 days earlier). Possible explanations of the differing perceptions of patients' palliative status are discussed. The findings have implications for patient care in the community, patients' informed choices, and palliative care research.

Key Words: communication • general practitioners • hospital doctors • palliative • patient status • primary–secondary interface

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 3, 247-250 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm520oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C Knapp, L Thompson, V Madden, and E Shenkman
Paediatricians' perceptions on referrals to paediatric palliative care
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2009; 23(5): 418 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
N. Schneider, H. Ebeling, V. E. Amelung, and K. Buser
Hospital doctors' attitudes towards palliative care in Germany
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2006; 20(5): 499 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
G. E. Grande, M. C. Farquhar, S. I. G. Barclay, and C. J. Todd
The influence of patient and carer age in access to palliative care services.
Age Ageing, May 1, 2006; 35(3): 267 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S. D Borgsteede, L. Deliens, A. L Francke, W. A. Stalman, D. L Willems, J. T. van Eijk, and G. van der Wal
Defining the patient population: one of the problems for palliative care research
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2006; 20(2): 63 - 68.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
B. Aabom, J. Kragstrup, H. Vondeling, L.S. Bakketeig, and H. Stovring
Defining Cancer Patients As Being in the Terminal Phase: Who Receives a Formal Diagnosis, and What Are the Effects?
J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7411 - 7416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
R Lewis, A Flynn, M E Dean, A Melville, A Eastwood, and A Booth
Management of colorectal cancers
Qual. Saf. Health Care, October 1, 2004; 13(5): 400 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
N Ahmed, J E Bestall, S H Ahmedzai, S A Payne, D Clark, and B Noble
Systematic review of the problems and issues of accessing specialist palliative care by patients, carers and health and social care professionals
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2004; 18(6): 525 - 542.
[Abstract] [PDF]