This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Payne, S Articles by George, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Payne, S Articles by George, S Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Differences in understanding of specialist palliative care amongst service providers and commissioners in South London

Health Research Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton

F Sheldon

N Jarrett

P Smith

C L Davis

P Turner

School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Southampton, Southampton

S George

Health Care Research Unit, Community Clinical Sciences Division, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton

This paper describes a study that sought to identify service providers' and commissioners' understanding of specialist palliative care within the context of changing service provision in one area of South London. Using a formative evaluation framework, we examined the views of 44 providers and commissioners from statutory and voluntary health and social care services about their understanding of specialist palliative care services and, in particular, the remit of current service provision delivered by a Marie Curie Centre. Face-to-face audiotaped semi-structured interviews were conducted. A qualitative thematic analysis highlighted a number of issues including a lack of consensus about definitions of palliative care, ambivalence about referral procedures, and a lack of role clarity between specialist and generalist palliative care providers. The study took place within the real world context of changing services and economic pressures. This raises methodological issues about how services are evaluated and what terminology is used to describe end-of-life care. The study findings confirm that confusion about terminology and referral criteria remain major issues for clinical workers and organizations seeking to access services.

Key Words: home care services • organization • palliative care • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 16, No. 5, 395-402 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216302pm572oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Koffman, G. Burke, A. Dias, B. Raval, J. Byrne, J. Gonzales, and C. Daniels Demographic factors and awareness of palliative care and related services Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 145 - 153. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. O'Connor and S Payne Discourse analysis: examining the potential for research in palliative care Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2006; 20(8): 829 - 834. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Jones Diversities in approach to end-of-life: A view from Britain of the qualitative literature Journal of Research in Nursing, July 1, 2005; 10(4): 431 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Seymour, S. Payne, D. Reid, A. Sargeant, J. Skilbeck, and P. Smith Ethical and methodological issues in palliative care studies: The experiences of a research group Journal of Research in Nursing, March 1, 2005; 10(2): 169 - 188. [Abstract] [PDF]