This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Clayton, J. Articles by Chye, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Clayton, J. Articles by Chye, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Parenteral antibiotics in a palliative care unit: prospective analysis of current practice

Sacred Heart Palliative Care Service, 170 Darlinghurst Road, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia; josephine{at}student.usyd.edu.au

Belinda Fardell

Sacred Heart Palliative Care Service, Sydney; Fremantle Hospital, Perth, Western Australia

Jane Hutton-Potts

David Webb

Richard Chye

Sacred Heart Palliative Care Service, Sydney

All patients receiving parenteral antibiotics in a palliative care unit were prospectively monitored over a 13-month period. Of 913 consecutive admissions, 41 patients received 43 courses of parenteral antibiotics. On 27 of 43 occasions, the use of parenteral antibiotics was considered helpful (62%), in eight cases it was considered unhelpful (19%) and in a further eight cases the outcome could not be assessed (19%). The sites of infection for which parenteral antibiotics were prescribed included urinary tract infections (37%), lower respiratory tract infections (26%), soft tissue/skin or wound infections (16%), purulent terminal respiratory secretions (5%) and other (16%). In this sample, urinary tract infections were more commonly associated with a positive outcome than other indications combined (88% versus 48%, respectively). There appeared to be no association between outcome of use and age of the patient (median age 70, range 37–90), underlying diagnosis (HIV versus advanced malignancy) and reason for admission (symptom control versus respite care versus terminal care). However, outcomes appeared to vary in this sample according to the palliative care phase of the patient at the time parenteral antibiotics were administered. Positive outcomes were more common in terminal- (83%) and stable-phase (71%) patients than deteriorating- (58%) or acute-phase (38%) patients. This survey demonstrates that in specific circumstances a beneficial role exists for the use of parenteral antibiotics in a palliative care setting. The establishment of appropriate guidelines is recommended.

Key Words: antibiotics • bacterial infection • infusions • injections • intramuscular • intravenous • palliative care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 1, 44-48 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216303pm595oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. C. Hughes, D. Jolley, A. Jordan, and E. L. Sampson Palliative care in dementia: issues and evidence Adv. Psychiatr. Treat., July 1, 2007; 13(4): 251 - 260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R Harding, D Karus, P Easterbrook, V H Raveis, I J Higginson, and K Marconi Does palliative care improve outcomes for patients with HIV/AIDS? A systematic review of the evidence Sex Transm Inf, February 1, 2005; 81(1): 5 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]