Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wragg, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stevens, T.
Right arrow Articles by Wragg, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Reviews

Palliative care research protocols: a special case for ethical review?

Tony Stevens

David Wilde

Silvia Paz

Sam H Ahmedzai

Academic Palliative Medicine Unit, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield

Angela Rawson

Dawn Wragg

Consumer Research Panel, North Trent Cancer Research Network, Sheffield

Between October 2001 and May 2002 the Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson of each Multicentre Research Ethics Committee (MREC) in England, Wales and Scotland took part in a semi-structured interview to ascertain the attitudes of MRECs to palliative care research. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using a grounded theory approach. Most respondents said each protocol was reviewed on its own merits, according to broad ethical principles, but were equivocal as to whether palliative care protocols posed particular or different challenges compared to those from other specialties. Respondents said they reviewed only a small number of palliative care protocols, and that they were less experienced with some of the study methods utilized, particularly qualitative designs. Four main themes emerged from the analysis. Respondents expressed concerns about the protocol itself – in regard to safeguarding the principles of autonomy and justice. There were concerns about how the research would be carried out, especially the protection of patients and the influence and input of the researcher in the process. The third theme concerned the impact of the research on the participant, particularly intrusion, potential distress and the existence of support mechanisms. Fourthly, respondents identified patient groups receiving palliative care (children, the elderly, bereaved families, patients in intensive therapy units, and those from ethnic groupings), who they considered might be particularly vulnerable.

Key Words: ethics committees • palliative care • research

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 6, 482-490 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216303pm786oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
A. Rapoport
Addressing Ethical Concerns Regarding Pediatric Palliative Care Research
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 2009; 163(8): 688 - 691.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
J Koffman, M Morgan, P Edmonds, P Speck, and I J Higginson
Vulnerability in palliative care research: findings from a qualitative study of black Caribbean and white British patients with advanced cancer
J. Med. Ethics, July 1, 2009; 35(7): 440 - 444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
S Cadell, G Ho, L Jacques, K Wilson, B Davies, and R Steele
Considerations for ethics in multisite research in paediatric palliative care
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2009; 23(3): 274 - 275.
[PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
K Ryan, M Leonard, S Guerin, S Donnelly, M Conroy, and D Meagher
Validation of the confusion assessment method in the palliative care setting
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 40 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. EthicsHome page
P W Keeley
Improving the evidence base in palliative medicine: a moral imperative
J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2008; 34(10): 757 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
D. Tomlinson, U. Bartels, E. Hendershot, J. Constantin, G. Wrathall, and L. Sung
Challenges to participation in paediatric palliative care research: a review of the literature
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 435 - 440.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
J R Dentith and J R Hardy
Letter to the editor
Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2004; 18(5): 484 - 485.
[PDF]