This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hirai, K. Articles by Kashiwagi, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hirai, K. Articles by Kashiwagi, T. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Cancer Cancer--Living with Cancer Stress Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Professionally perceived effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for existential suffering of terminally ill cancer patients

Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan

Tatsuya Morita

Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Tetsuo Kashiwagi

Graduate School of Human Sciences, Kinjyo Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan

Background: Although integrated care for existential suffering is an essential part of palliative care, little is known about its concept and efficacy as perceived by professionals. A questionnaire survey was carried out to 1) explore the underlying structure of psychosocial interventions recommended by specialists, 2) identify the professionally perceived effectiveness of each intervention for specific existential distress, and 3) examine the effects of specialty on their recommendations. Methods: A questionnaire with three scenarios representing terminally ill cancer patients with uncertainty-related anxiety, guilt feelings, and dependency-related meaninglessness was mailed to 701 Japanese psychiatrists, 118 psychologists, and 372 palliative care nurses. Results: A total of 456 responses were obtained (response rate = 38%). Recommended psychosocial interventions were classified into six subcategories: ’a supportive-expressive approach,fl’providing comfortable environments,fl’meaning-centered approach,fl’being,fl’education and coping skills training,fland ’a religious approach.flA ’supportive-expressive approachflwas consistently recommended in all vignettes. On the other hand, ’providing comfortable environmentsflwas most recommended for patients with uncertainty-related anxiety, and a ’meaning-centered approachfland ’beingflwere most recommended for patients feeling dependency-related meaninglessness. Psychiatrists estimated the effectiveness of psychopharmacological treatment significantly higher than psychologists and nurses, while nurses evaluated efficacy of all other interventions significantly higher than psychiatrists and psychologists. Conclusions: Experts evaluated a variety of clinical interventions as effective in palliating existential suffering, although the perceived levels of efficacy of each intervention differed according to the nature of suffering and their specialties. To effectively alleviate existential suffering in terminally ill cancer patients, an integrated care by an interdisciplinary team is necessary.

Key Words: existentialism • neoplasms • palliative care • psychotherapy • spirituality

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 17, No. 8, 688-694 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216303pm825oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J.-S. Tsai, C.-H. Wu, T.-Y. Chiu, W.-Y. Hu, and C.-Y. Chen Symptom patterns of advanced cancer patients in a palliative care unit Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2006; 20(6): 617 - 622. [Abstract] [PDF]