Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Needham, P R
Right arrow Articles by Newbury, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Needham, P R
Right arrow Articles by Newbury, J
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Goal setting as a measure of outcome in palliative care

P R Needham

J Newbury

Dorothy House Hospice, Winsley

Setting goals and assessing outcomes are essential elements in palliative care. This paper describes a multiprofessional project, conducted under the auspices of clinical audit, which attempted to evaluate important outcomes of care. Over a six-month period there were 123 consecutive admissions to the hospice. These patients and their carers, as well as the staff, were encouraged to set explicit goals for, and evaluate outcomes of, their care. As anticipated, we encountered many difficulties in this, but there were benefits. We were able to record goals of admission from the patient in 97 cases (79%), their main carer in 74 cases (63%) and from hospice staff in 120 cases (98%). Patient and carer goals were often more functional and specific whereas the staff goals tended to be more problem or symptom focused. The achievement of these goals was evaluated by patients, carers and staff at discharge or death (where possible) with the majority being fully or partially met. Only 15 patients and 9 carers thought that some or all of their goals had not been achieved with just 4 recording that their goals had changed. Overall, it was a worthwhile (although time-consuming) exercise and, as a result of the ‘audit’, clear goals and outcomes from patient, carer and staff perspectives are now routinely recorded for all admissions to the hospice and are used to focus multiprofessional patient review. Having analysed the process as well as the results of the ‘audit’, we would encourage others not to be daunted from undertaking similar projects.

Key Words: audit • carer participation • goals • hospice • outcomes • patient participation

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 5, 444-451 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216304pm904oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CAREHome page
L. C. Kaldjian, A. E. Curtis, L. A. Shinkunas, and K. T. Cannon
Review Article: Goals of Care Toward the End of Life: A Structured Literature Review
American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2009; 25(6): 501 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
E. J. Pearson, J. G Todd, and J. M Futcher
How can occupational therapists measure outcomes in palliative care?
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2007; 21(6): 477 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]