Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, G W
Right arrow Articles by Busch, M A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hanks, G W
Right arrow Articles by Busch, M A
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer
Hazardous Substances DB
*FENTANYL
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate in the management of breakthrough pain in cancer: an open, multicentre, dose-titration and long-term use study

G W Hanks

University of Bristol, Bristol

M Nugent

St Lukes' Hospice, Plymouth

C M B Higgs

Dorothy House Hospice, Nr Bath

M A Busch

Anesta Corporation, Salt Lake City, UT

Sixty-six patients with cancer-related pain entered an open multicentre study to examine the safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) in the treatment of breakthrough pain. Patients were eligible for the study if they were stabilized on a long acting opioid but were experiencing up to four episodes of breakthrough pain a day and achieving at least partial relief from breakthrough pain using conventional medication (normal release oral morphine in the majority of patients). The efficacy of the conventional medication was documented in a run-in phase and patients then changed to OTFC. All patients were treated initially with a 200 mcg unit of OTFC and the dose was increased if necessary to a level that produced relief of breakthrough pain without troublesome adverse effects. Fifty-eight patients completed the run-in phase using their usual medication and entered the dose titration phase with OTFC and 57 patients received at least one dose of OTFC. Forty-two patients (72%) found a successful dose of OTFC. The primary outcome measures were the Summed Pain Intensity Differences (SPID) and Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) scores at 60 min. There was a significant difference in both measures in favour of OTFC compared with conventional medication in these patients. Twenty-eight of the 42 patients (67%) preferred OTFC to their usual medication. The most common adverse effects attributed to OTFC were nausea, stomatitis, vomiting and dizziness but there were no unpredicted or severe problems. Thirty-seven patients continued into the long-term study and 12 of these completed six months treatment. Most drop-outs in this phase were associated with progression of the underlying disease. No patient stopped using OTFC because of dissatisfaction with the drug. OTFC appears to be a safe and effective treatment for breakthrough pain in cancer patients and may have advantages over currently available opioid formulations.

Key Words: breakthrough pain • open multicentre study • OTFC

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 8, 698-704 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216304pm966oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?