This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Schildmann, J. Articles by Vollmann, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schildmann, J. Articles by Vollmann, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Breaking bad news: experiences, views and difficulties of pre-registration house officers

Institute for History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine III, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen

Annie Cushing

Clinical Communication and Learning Skills Unit, Barts and The London, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London

Len Doyal

Department of Human Science and Medical Ethics, Queen Mary's School of Medicine and Dentistry, Whitechapel, London

Jochen Vollmann

Institute for History of Medicine and Medical Ethics, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen

Objectives: To obtain information regarding the involvement of pre-registration house officers (PRHOs) in the discussions on bad news, and the competency and difficulties they perceive in clinical practice. Design: Structured telephone interviews. Participants: 104 PRHOs. Main outcome measures: Information about frequency and quality of involvement of PRHOs in discussions on bad news with patients and relatives, perceived competency and difficulties related to this task as well as ethical views concerning the disclosure of bad news. Results: 82 PRHOs (78.9%) had initiated the breaking of bad news to a patient at least once, whilst patients themselves had initiated discussions of bad news by asking the doctors questions (92.3%). Almost all (96.2%), indicated that they had broken bad news to relatives of a patient. The majority of the junior doctors participating in our study felt fairly or very confident (90.4%) to break bad news. ‘Often’ quoted difficulties for over a fifth of the sample included ‘Thinking I was not the appropriate person to discuss the bad news', ‘Having all the relevant information available’, ‘Dealing with emotions of patient/ relative’, ‘Lack of privacy’ and ‘Patients/relatives do not speak English’. Although 99 PRHOs (95.2%) believed that patients should be informed about a serious life threatening illness, 30.8% of the participants stated that doctors need to judge whether or not to tell a patient bad news. Factors most frequently selected by the PRHOs from a given list of possible factors contributing to a gap between theory and practice included problems with the organization of clinics (73.1%), insufficient postgraduate training (63.5%) and lack of staff (54.8%). Conclusions: The results indicate that PRHOs are frequently involved in the breaking of bad news. Whilst no claims can be made for their actual performance in practice, their perceptions of competency would indicate that the extensive and compulsory undergraduate teaching they had received on this subject has served to prepare them for this difficult task. Organizational and structural aspects need to be taken into account as factors assisting or undermining doctors in their efforts to put into practice ethically sound and skilled communication when disclosing bad news.

Key Words: breaking bad news • difficulties • ethical standards • experiences • pre-registration house officers • views

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 2, 93-98 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216305pm996oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J Schildmann, L Doyal, A Cushing, and J Vollmann Decisions at the end of life: an empirical study on the involvement, legal understanding and ethical views of preregistration house officers. J. Med. Ethics, October 1, 2006; 32(10): 567 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]