Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hølen, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Kaasa, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hølen, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Kaasa, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Dementia
*Pain
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Norwegian Doloplus-2, a tool for behavioural pain assessment: translation and pilot-validation in nursing home patients with cognitive impairment

Jacob C Hølen

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

Ingvild Saltvedt

Medical Department, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim

Peter M Fayers

Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen Medical School, Aberdeen, Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

Marit Bjørnnes

Guri Stenseth

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim

Bjørn Hval

Department of Anaesthesiology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim

Marilène Filbet

Centre de soins palliatifs, Hospices Civils de Lyon

Jon Håvard Loge

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, University of Oslo and Ullevaal University Hospital

Stein Kaasa

Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim

Background: Pain assessment is challenging in cognitively impaired (CI) patients due to inadequate self-report skills and observational ratings are an alternative. The Doloplus-2 is developed for pain assessment in the CI and rates somatic, psychomotor and psychosocial behaviours as indicators of pain. Aims: To translate the Doloplus-2 into Norwegian, to test the Doloplus-2 with regard to criterion validity and to obtain the administrators' evaluation of the clinical performance of the Doloplus-2. Methods: Nurses at three nursing homes, in collaboration with two research assistants, administered the Doloplus-2 to 59 patients with dementia. The results were compared against experienced clinicians' pain ratings. Regression analyses were performed to explore each different item's contribution to the total pain score. The administrators also completed a debriefing questionnaire. Results: The instrument was translated according to international guidelines. Regression analyses demonstrate that the Doloplus-2 score accounts for 62% (R2) of the expert score and that the four most informative items could explain 68% of the expert score. Analyses of the different Doloplus-2 items indicate that facial expressions explain most and social life least of the expert's pain ratings. The administrators reported that Doloplus-2 was helpful and easy to administer, but questioned the validity of the psychosocial domain. Conclusions: The Norwegian Doloplus-2 demonstrates satisfactory criterion validity and clinical value in this pilot study. However, the content of the instrument needs a general re-evaluation, especially with regard to the psychosocial items.

Key Words: dementia • geriatrics • measurement • observational assessment • pain • palliative patients

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 5, 411-417 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216305pm1031oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DementiaHome page
G. Evans
Improving end of life care for the person with dementia: A practical approach from general practice
Dementia, August 1, 2009; 8(3): 363 - 376.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
K Torvik, S Kaasa, O Kirkevold, and T Rustoen
Pain in patients living in Norwegian nursing homes
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2009; 23(1): 8 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]