This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Finlay, I G Articles by Izdebski, C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Finlay, I G Articles by Izdebski, C Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The House of Lords Select Committee on the Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill: implications for specialist palliative care

Department of Palliative Medicine, Velindre Hospital NHS Trust, Cardiff, Wales

V J Wheatley

Department of Palliative Medicine, Velindre Hospital NHS Trust, Whitchurch, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK; vicwheatley{at}doctors.org.uk

C Izdebski

The Assisted Dying for the Terminally Ill Bill proposed to legalise both euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide for those with a terminal illness in the UK. A House of Lords Select Committee was convened to scrutinise this Bill and has recently published its report, which will be debated in Parliament on October 10th 2005.

The written and oral evidence submitted to the Select Committee represented a wide range of views on 'assisted dying'. Much of the evidence from those countries which have legalised euthanasia/physician-assisted suicide (The Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland and Oregon, USA) dealt with the practicalities of ending life, and the legal procedures and safeguards instigated in these countries.

All the written and oral evidence in the public domain was scrutinised by the authors whilst the Select Committee was sitting. We have extracted those themes relevant to specialist palliative care practice and present them in this paper. We hope that this will provide a useful resource to inform the forthcoming public debate on assisted dying. The evidence of harms inherent in making such a change in the law, as presented to the Select Committee, has moved all three authors to oppose a change in the law.

Key Words: assisted suicide • euthanasia • legislation • palliative care • parliament • Select Committee

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J Pereira, P Laurent, B Cantin, D Petremand, and T Currat The response of a Swiss university hospital's palliative care consult team to assisted suicide within the institution Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2008; 22(5): 659 - 667. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G Bosshard, B Broeckaert, D Clark, L J Materstvedt, B Gordijn, and H C Muller-Busch A role for doctors in assisted dying? An analysis of legal regulations and medical professional positions in six European countries J. Med. Ethics, January 1, 2008; 34(1): 28 - 32. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L Hudson, L. J Kristjanson, M. Ashby, B. Kelly, P. Schofield, R. Hudson, S. Aranda, M. O'Connor, and A. Street Desire for hastened death in patients with advanced disease and the evidence base of clinical guidelines: a systematic review. Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2006; 20(7): 693 - 701. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. J. Materstvedt Letter to the Editor Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2006; 20(1): 49 - 50. [PDF]