Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Randall, T. C
Right arrow Articles by Wearn, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Randall, T. C
Right arrow Articles by Wearn, A. M
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Leukemia, Adult Acute
*Leukemia, Adult Chronic
*Lymphoma
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Receiving bad news: patients with haematological cancer reflect upon their experience

Tina C Randall

The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, tcrandall{at}doctors.org.uk

Andy M Wearn

Clinical Skills Resource Centre, The University of Auckland, Auckland

The literature on breaking bad news (BBN) tends to focus on professional consensus rather than empirical patient evidence -the ‘giver’ rather than the ‘receiver’. Using semi-structured interviews, this study explores the experiences of patients with haematological cancer as they reflect on the process and content of receiving bad news.

Fifteen patients with a diagnosis of leukaemia or lymphoma were recruited through a haematology service during a routine clinical visit, with the decision to participate being made later. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis.

Patients place importance on not being rushed during the bad news consultation and the doctor’s manner. Receiving bad news was the first step on a journey, not an isolated incident. Doctors were regarded as the best judge of their information needs, with leaflets and written summaries as supplements. Patients had strong preferences about continuity and language use. Displays of empathy were important, but must be genuine. Patients wanted to know about likely emotional reactions and future support. Where patients brought a companion, they found this valuable.

Patients concur with much of the content of the guidelines, but place more emphasis on their illness journey, the doctor’s ability to adapt to their emotional needs, language used, information leaflets, having a companion and genuinely personalizing the approach. Reflection on these patient-derived factors may help health professionals better serve patients with serious illness.

Key Words: breaking bad news • diagnosis of cancer • physician-patient relationship

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 8, 594-601 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216305pm1080oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Jpn J Clin OncolHome page
M. Fujimori and Y. Uchitomi
Preferences of Cancer Patients Regarding Communication of Bad News: A Systematic Literature Review
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol., April 1, 2009; 39(4): 201 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]