Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by King, N.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by King, N.
Right arrow Articles by Farrell, S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Palliative Care
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

‘Now nobody falls through the net’: practitioners’ perspectives on the Gold Standards Framework for community palliative care

Nigel King

School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, n.king{at}hud.ac.uk

Keri Thomas

John Taylor Hospice, Birmingham

Nina Martin

School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate

Dennise Bell

School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate

Sharon Farrell

School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate

The Gold Standards Framework (GSF) seeks to facilitate consistent and high quality community palliative care through a set of guidelines, mechanisms and assessment tools. The present study set out to examine practitioners’ perspectives on the GSF during its first national roll-out. Two general practices that had adopted the GSF were recruited in each of four geographical areas, and each matched as closely as possible with a non-GSF practice. Sixty-eight semi-structured telephone interviews were carried out with general practitioners and district nurses in 16 selected practices, along with the GSF facilitator and up to four other ‘stakeholders’ in each area. Analysis revealed that the majority of GSF participants felt that the framework had strengthened their provision of community palliative care. In particular, communication within primary health care teams and co-ordination of services improved, aspects which were better in the GSF practices than in the matched non-GSF practices. Practitioners felt there was more consistency of care, with a reduced likelihood that individual patients would ‘slip through the net’. The most common areas of concern were in relation to the workload associated with the role of the GSF co-ordinator. Implications for the development and effective implementation of the framework and for further research are discussed.

Key Words: community palliative care • qualitative • standards

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 8, 619-627 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216305pm1084oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
F Badger, C Clifford, A Hewison, and K Thomas
An evaluation of the implementation of a programme to improve end-of-life care in nursing homes
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2009; 23(6): 502 - 511.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
J Dale, M Petrova, D Munday, J Koistinen-Harris, R Lall, and K Thomas
A national facilitation project to improve primary palliative care: impact of the Gold Standards Framework on process and self-ratings of quality
Qual. Saf. Health Care, June 1, 2009; 18(3): 174 - 180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C Walshe, A Caress, C Chew-Graham, and C Todd
Implementation and impact of the Gold Standards Framework in community palliative care: a qualitative study of three primary care trusts
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2008; 22(6): 736 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Qual Saf Health CareHome page
R. D MacLeod
Quality of dying--how are we doing?
Qual. Saf. Health Care, August 1, 2008; 17(4): 237 - 238.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Fam PractHome page
D. Munday, K. Mahmood, J. Dale, and N. King
Facilitating good process in primary palliative care: does the Gold Standards Framework enable quality performance?
Fam. Pract., October 1, 2007; 24(5): 486 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
F. Twomey, D. K. McDowell, and G. D. Corcoran
End-of-life care for older patients dying in an acute general hospital can we do better?
Age Ageing, July 1, 2007; 36(4): 462 - 464.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Munday and J. Dale
Palliative care in the community
BMJ, April 21, 2007; 334(7598): 809 - 810.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
S. Dy and J. Lynn
Getting services right for those sick enough to die
BMJ, March 10, 2007; 334(7592): 511 - 513.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
K. Thomas and B. Noble
Improving the delivery of palliative care in general practice: an evaluation of the first phase of the Gold Standards Framework
Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2007; 21(1): 49 - 53.
[Abstract] [PDF]