| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Towards better measurements in bereavement research: order of questions and assessed psychological morbidityDivision of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, arna.hauksdottir{at}ki.se
Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm and Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg's University, Göteborg
Stockholms sjukhem foundation, Stockholm
Division of Clinical Cancer Epidemiology, Department of Oncology-Pathology and Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden The aim of this study was to determine if the order of questions in a study on men who have lost a wife in cancer affects self-assessed measures of psychological morbidity. Data were collected from 76 men who had lost a wife owing to cancer in the breast, ovary or colon in 1999. They were randomly allocated to one of two questionnaires with identical content but varying design. One version began with questions about the wifes disease and ended with the respondents current wellbeing (morbidity-last group). The other version had a reversed order (morbidity-first group). Results showed that the design of the questionnaire affected self-assessed psychological morbidity; all relative risks for these measures were above 1.0 in the morbidity-last group. The highest relative risk was obtained for anxiety (as measured by HADS), 3.4 (0.8-15.0), and depression (as measured by a visual-digital scale), 3.1 (1.2-8.5). Psychological morbidity is assessed as higher when questions appear in the end, rather than the beginning, of a bereavement-related questionnaire. In order to avoid a detrimental bias in a study on bereavement, psychological morbidity is probably best measured first in such a questionnaire.
Key Words: anxiety bereavement depression order of questions
Palliative Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 1,
11-16 (2006) This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
