|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
National survey of end-of-life decisions made by UK medical practitioners
Clive Seale
School of Social Science and Law, Brunel University, Middlesex, clive.seale{at}brunel.ac.uk
Background: This study estimates the frequency of different end-of-life decisions (ELDs) in medical practice in the UK, compares these with other countries and assesses doctors’ views on the adequacy of current UK law. Method: Postal survey of 857 UK medical practitioners using a questionnaire used in other countries. Findings: The proportion of UK deaths involving an ELD were: 1) voluntary euthanasia 0.16% (0-0.36), 2) physician-assisted suicide 0.00%, 3) ending of life without an explicit request from patient 0.33% (0-0.76), 4) alleviation of symptoms with possibly life shortening effect 32.8% (28.1-37.6), 5) non-treatment decisions 30.3% (26.0-34.6). ELDs 1 and 2 were significantly less frequent than in the Netherlands and Australia; ELD 2 was also less frequent than Switzerland. ELD 3 was less frequent than in Belgium and Australia. Comparison of UK and New Zealand general practitioners showed lower rates of ELDs 4 and 5 in the UK. ELD 5 was more common than in most other European countries. A few doctors attending deaths felt UK law had inhibited or interfered with their preferred management of patients (4.6% (3.1-6.1%) of doctors) or that a new law would have facilitated better management (2.6% (1.4-3.8%) of doctors). Interpretation: The lower relative rate of ELDs involving doctor-assisted dying in the UK, and the relatively high rate of non-treatment decisions, suggests a culture of medical decision making informed by a palliative care philosophy.
Key Words: euthanasia • physician-assisted suicide • right to die • terminal care • withdrawing treatment • withholding treatment
Palliative Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 1,
3-10 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216306pm1094oa
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
E. Pugh, R Song, V Whittaker, and J Blenkinsopp
A profile of the belief system and attitudes to end-of-life decisions of senior clinicians working in a National Health Service Hospital in the United Kingdom
Palliative Medicine,
March 1, 2009;
23(2):
158 - 164.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Bartram and D. S. Baldwin
Veterinary surgeons and suicide: influences, opportunities and research directions
Vet Rec.,
January 12, 2008;
162(2):
36 - 40.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Cartwright, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, G. Williams, K. Faisst, F. Mortier, T. Nilstun, M. Norup, A. van der Heide, and G. Miccinesi
Physician discussions with terminally ill patients: a cross-national comparison
Palliative Medicine,
June 1, 2007;
21(4):
295 - 303.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Lewis
The Empirical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Non-Voluntary Euthanasia
J. Law Med. Ethics,
March 1, 2007;
35(1):
197 - 210.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. George and C. Regnard
Lethal opioids or dangerous prescribers?
Palliative Medicine,
March 1, 2007;
21(2):
77 - 80.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D Harris, B Richard, and P Khanna
Assisted dying: the ongoing debate.
Postgrad. Med. J.,
August 1, 2006;
82(970):
479 - 482.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Forbes and R. Huxtable
Clarifying the data on double effect
Palliative Medicine,
June 1, 2006;
20(4):
395 - 396.
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Finlay
;First do no harm'--a clear line in law and medical ethics.
J R Soc Med,
May 1, 2006;
99(5):
214 - 215.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
