This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Seale, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Seale, C. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

National survey of end-of-life decisions made by UK medical practitioners

School of Social Science and Law, Brunel University, Middlesex, clive.seale{at}brunel.ac.uk

Background: This study estimates the frequency of different end-of-life decisions (ELDs) in medical practice in the UK, compares these with other countries and assesses doctors’ views on the adequacy of current UK law. Method: Postal survey of 857 UK medical practitioners using a questionnaire used in other countries. Findings: The proportion of UK deaths involving an ELD were: 1) voluntary euthanasia 0.16% (0-0.36), 2) physician-assisted suicide 0.00%, 3) ending of life without an explicit request from patient 0.33% (0-0.76), 4) alleviation of symptoms with possibly life shortening effect 32.8% (28.1-37.6), 5) non-treatment decisions 30.3% (26.0-34.6). ELDs 1 and 2 were significantly less frequent than in the Netherlands and Australia; ELD 2 was also less frequent than Switzerland. ELD 3 was less frequent than in Belgium and Australia. Comparison of UK and New Zealand general practitioners showed lower rates of ELDs 4 and 5 in the UK. ELD 5 was more common than in most other European countries. A few doctors attending deaths felt UK law had inhibited or interfered with their preferred management of patients (4.6% (3.1-6.1%) of doctors) or that a new law would have facilitated better management (2.6% (1.4-3.8%) of doctors). Interpretation: The lower relative rate of ELDs involving doctor-assisted dying in the UK, and the relatively high rate of non-treatment decisions, suggests a culture of medical decision making informed by a palliative care philosophy.

Key Words: euthanasia • physician-assisted suicide • right to die • terminal care • withdrawing treatment • withholding treatment

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 1, 3-10 (2006)
DOI: 10.1191/0269216306pm1094oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Draper, J. Ives, H. Pall, S. Smith, S. Damery, and S. Wilson Reporting end-of-life practice: can we trust doctors to be honest? Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2009; 23(7): 673 - 674. [PDF]

				C. Seale Counting end of life decisions BMJ, September 14, 2009; 339(sep14_1): b3690 - b3690. [Full Text]

				L. Van den Block, R. Deschepper, J. Bilsen, N. Bossuyt, V. Van Casteren, and L. Deliens Euthanasia and other end of life decisions and care provided in final three months of life: nationwide retrospective study in Belgium BMJ, July 30, 2009; 339(jul30_2): b2772 - b2772. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Pugh, R Song, V Whittaker, and J Blenkinsopp A profile of the belief system and attitudes to end-of-life decisions of senior clinicians working in a National Health Service Hospital in the United Kingdom Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2009; 23(2): 158 - 164. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. J. Bartram and D. S. Baldwin Veterinary surgeons and suicide: influences, opportunities and research directions Vet Rec., January 12, 2008; 162(2): 36 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Cartwright, B. D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen, G. Williams, K. Faisst, F. Mortier, T. Nilstun, M. Norup, A. van der Heide, and G. Miccinesi Physician discussions with terminally ill patients: a cross-national comparison Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2007; 21(4): 295 - 303. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Lewis The Empirical Slippery Slope from Voluntary to Non-Voluntary Euthanasia J. Law Med. Ethics, March 1, 2007; 35(1): 197 - 210. [PDF]

				R. George and C. Regnard Lethal opioids or dangerous prescribers? Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2007; 21(2): 77 - 80. [PDF]

				D Harris, B Richard, and P Khanna Assisted dying: the ongoing debate. Postgrad. Med. J., August 1, 2006; 82(970): 479 - 482. [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Forbes and R. Huxtable Clarifying the data on double effect Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2006; 20(4): 395 - 396. [PDF]

				I. Finlay ;First do no harm'--a clear line in law and medical ethics. J R Soc Med, May 1, 2006; 99(5): 214 - 215. [Full Text] [PDF]