This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Foreman, L. M Articles by Roder, D. M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Foreman, L. M Articles by Roder, D. M Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia

The Cancer Council South Australia, Adelaide

Roger W Hunt

Western Adelaide Palliative Care, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide

Colin G Luke

Epidemiology Branch, South Australian Health Department, Adelaide

David M Roder

Centre for Cancer Control Research, The Cancer Council South Australia, Adelaide, droder{at}cancersa.org.au

In a population survey, 2652 respondents aged 15+years reported their preferred place of death, if dying of ‘a terminal illness such as cancer or emphysema’, to be home (70%), a hospital (19%), hospice (10%), or nursing home (< 1%). The majority of respondents in all socio-demographic categories reported a preference for dying at home, with the greatest majorities occurring in younger age groups. After weighting to the age-sex distribution of all South Australian cancer deaths, 58% in our survey declared a preference to die at home, which is much higher than the 14% of cancer deaths that actually occurred at home in South Australia in 2000-2002. Multivariable analyses indicate that predictors of preferred home death include younger age, male, born in the UK/Ireland or Italy/Greece, better physical health, poorer mental health, and fewer concerns about dying at home. Predictors of preference for death in a hospice rather than hospital include older age, female, single, metropolitan residence, having higher educational and income levels, paid employment, awareness of advanced directives, and interpreting ‘dying with dignity’ as death without pain or suffering. Investigating the differences between preferred and actual places of death may assist service providers to meet end-of-life wishes.

Key Words: cancer • emphysema • place of death • predictors

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. T. Tang, S.-C. Wu, Y.-N. Hung, E.-W. Huang, J.-S. Chen, and T.-W. Liu Trends in quality of end-of-life care for Taiwanese cancer patients who died in 2000-2006 Ann. Onc., September 2, 2008; (2008) mdn602v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Brink and T. Frise Smith Determinants of Home Death in Palliative Home Care: Using the interRAI Palliative Care to Assess End-of-Life Care American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, August 1, 2008; 25(4): 263 - 270. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Miyashita, K Sato, T Morita, and M Suzuki Effect of a population-based educational intervention focusing on end-of-life home care, life-prolonging treatment and knowledge about palliative care Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2008; 22(4): 376 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H.-C. Lin, Y.-J. Lin, T.-C. Liu, C.-S. Chen, and C.-C. Lin Urbanization and place of death for the elderly: a 10-year population-based study Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2007; 21(8): 705 - 711. [Abstract] [PDF]