This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Currow, D. C Articles by Phillips, P. A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Currow, D. C Articles by Phillips, P. A Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The impact of conducting a regional palliative care clinical study

Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Bedford Park and Southern Adelaide Palliative Services, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park, david.currow{at}rgh.sa.gov.au

Amy P Abernethy

Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Bedford Park and Southern Adelaide Palliative Services, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park and Department of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Centre, Durham

Tania M Shelby-James

Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Bedford Park and Southern Adelaide Palliative Services, Repatriation General Hospital, Daw Park

Paddy A Phillips

Department of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide

End-of-life care must be informed by methodologically rigorous, high-quality research, but well-documented barriers make the conduct of palliative care clinical trials difficult. With careful consideration to study design and procedures, these barriers are surmountable. This paper discusses the approach used in a large scale, randomised, controlled trial of service-based interventions in a regional palliative care service in South Australia, and the impact of this trial on palliative care research more broadly, the changes to the service in which it was conducted, and on health policy beyond palliative care.

The Palliative Care Trial evaluated three interventions in a 2 x 2 x 2 factorial cluster randomised design: case conferences, general practitioner education, and patient education. Main outcomes were performance status, pain intensity, and resource utilisation. A total of 461 patients were enrolled in the study.

Pre-study planning and piloting is crucial, and accurately estimated withdrawal and death rates in the study. Other study design elements that facilitated this research included assessment of three interventions at one time, a dedicated recruitment role, a single clinical triage point, embedding data collection into routine clinical assessments, and meaningful outcome measures. Recruitment and retention of participants is possible if barriers are systematically identified and addressed.

This study challenged and developed the research culture within our clinical team and subsequently translated into further research.

Key Words: adult education • clinical trials methodology • health services research • pain management • palliative care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 20, No. 8, 735-743 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0269216306072346


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M Agar, D Currow, J Plummer, R Seidel, R Carnahan, and A. Abernethy Changes in anticholinergic load from regular prescribed medications in palliative care as death approaches Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2009; 23(3): 257 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Agar, D. Currow, T. Shelby-James, J Plummer, C Sanderson, and A. Abernethy Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions? Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2008; 22(7): 787 - 795. [Abstract] [PDF]