This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Ackroyd, R. Articles by Newell, R. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ackroyd, R. Articles by Newell, R. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Views of oncology patients, their relatives and oncologists on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): questionnaire-based study

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford, jeenamoses{at}hotmail.com

Lynne Russon

Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Bradford

Rob Newell

School of Health Studies, University of Bradford, Bradford

Background: Doctors are justified withholding a treatment, such as cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), if it is unlikely to benefit a patient. The success rates for CPR in patients with cancer is <1%. Guidelines produced in 2001 recommended that CPR should be discussed with patients, even when it is unlikely to be successful. Therefore, should oncologists always discuss resuscitation, even when it is likely to be futile?

Method: Sixty oncology in-patients and 32 of their relatives were asked their views on CPR, and their views were compared with the oncologist involved in their care.

Results: Some 58% of patients wanted to be resuscitated. There was a moderate-strong correlation between patients and their next of kin and the desire for resuscitation. There was also a positive correlation between the doctor’s views on suitability for resuscitation, patient’s prognostic score, and World Health Organisation (WHO) performance score.

Conclusion: Most patients wanted to be resuscitated despite being given the likely poor survival rates from CPR. They also wanted to be involved in the decision-making process, and wanted their next of kin involved, even when, medically, the procedure was unlikely to be successful. The findings that patient and next of kin views correlated well shows that relatives’ views are a good representation of patient views. In contrast, consultant’s decisions were strongly correlated with the patient’s performance status and clinical state. No patients were upset by the study, although nine patients declined to participate.

Key Words: cardiopulmonary resuscitation • decision making • resuscitation orders • survival rates

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 2, 139-144 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269216306074629


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F Tyrer, M Williams, L Feathers, C Faull, and I Baker Factors that influence decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation: the views of doctors and medical students Postgrad. Med. J., November 1, 2009; 85(1009): 564 - 568. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mohammed and E. Peter Rituals, Death and the Moral Practice of Medical Futility Nursing Ethics, May 1, 2009; 16(3): 292 - 302. [Abstract] [PDF]

				H. Johnson and A Nelson The acceptability of an information leaflet explaining cardiopulmonary resuscitation policy in the hospice setting: a qualitative study exploring patients' views Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2008; 22(5): 647 - 652. [Abstract] [PDF]