This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jünger, S. Articles by Radbruch, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jünger, S. Articles by Radbruch, L. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Criteria for successful multiprofessional cooperation in palliative care teams

Aachen University, Aachen

M. Pestinger

Aachen University, Aachen

F. Elsner

Aachen University, Aachen

N. Krumm

Aachen University, Aachen

L. Radbruch

Aachen University, Aachen, lradbruch{at}ukaachen.de

Introduction : Team work is considered a central component of palliative care. Within this comparatively young field of medicine, the emergence of new institutions (eg, palliative care units) highlights the challenge of establishing a completely new team. Methods : This study focuses on the factors, which enhance both the success and outcome criteria of good team work from the perception of team members in a palliative care unit. The palliative care team at the University Hospital of Aachen (n = 19) was interviewed 1 year after the unit's startup by the means of semistructured interviews. Interview texts were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Results : Factors crucial to cooperation in the team members' views were close communication, team philosophy, good interpersonal relationships, high team commitment, autonomy and the ability to deal with death and dying. Moreover, close communication was by far the most frequently mentioned criteria for cooperation. Team performance, good coordination of workflow and mutual trust underpin the evaluation of efficient team work. Inefficient team work is associated with the absence of clear goals, tasks and role delegation, as well as a lack of team commitment. Conclusion : In a new team, close communication is particularly important for staff as they reorientate themselves to the dynamics of a new peer group. The results confirm the overwhelming importance of clarity, commitment and close, positive exchange among team members for succesful team work. Pallative Medicine 2007; 21: 347—354

Key Words: cooperation • multidisciplinary team • qualitative research • team work

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?