This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wilson, E. Articles by Cox, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wilson, E. Articles by Cox, K. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Community palliative care development: evaluating the role and impact of a general practitioner with a special interest in palliative medicine

School of Nursing, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham

Karen Cox

School of Nursing, University of Nottingham, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, karen.cox{at}nottingham.ac.uk

In the context of an increased national policy focus on the development of palliative and end of life care services the post of a GP with a special interest in palliative medicine (GPSI) was introduced in one region of the UK to fortify its current palliative care provision. This paper presents findings from an evaluation of the first 2 years of the GPSI post. A mixed method evaluation design was adopted incorporating qualitative interviews, a satisfaction survey and an activity log.

As a concept, the GPSI was welcomed as a suitable and imaginative way to provide much needed medical input. At baseline interviews stakeholders saw the role as an added resource both clinically and educationally, placing highest value on the clinical element of the role. There were concerns related to referral practices (referral was via a GP only) as well as the low profile of the new role. At the final stage of the evaluation, almost 2 years since the role began, stakeholders noted that the use of the GPSI for informal advice and support was highly valued, but also noted that more had been expected, particularly in relation to increased clinical input. The evaluation contained important lessons both for the continuation of this GPSI post and for other regions considering appointing a GPSI in this speciality. Palliative Medicine 2007; 21: 527—535

Key Words: general practice • palliative care • service evaluation • special interest

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 21, No. 6, 527-535 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0269216307082018


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?