This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Hanratty, B Articles by Whitehead, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hanratty, B Articles by Whitehead, M Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Socioeconomic differences in service use, payment and receipt of illness-related benefits in the last year of life: findings from the British Household Panel Survey

Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool

A Jacoby

Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool

M Whitehead

Division of Public Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool

Background: Terminal illness presents a financial challenge to many households, but in Britain the situation should be eased by state benefits, such as attendance allowance, which is available to everyone in the last six months of life without means testing. Aim: To investigate the use of health and social services, payments and benefit receipt by individuals in differing financial circumstances in the year before death. Methods: Analysis of individual level panel data for 1652 community-dwelling decedents from 12 waves of the British Household Panel Study (1991–2003). Results: In the year before death, over 90% of decedents saw their GP, and around one-third spent some time in hospital. More than 80% paid no fees for any services. Over a third of decedents aged over 65 reported financial strain, but only 13.9% of these were receiving attendance allowance. People who felt that they were having financial difficulties were more likely to be frequent attenders in primary care, taking age, health status and other factors into account (adjusted OR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.3–2.6, P < 0.001). Older age was associated with less use of primary, but not secondary care. Conclusions: Financial strain was common, but benefit uptake low. Primary health care professionals saw nearly all decedents in their last year, and could play an important role in ensuring that the elderly and the less well off are aware of the services and benefits available to them.

Key Words: health services accessibility • health services for the aged • social welfare • socioeconomic factors • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 3, 248-255 (2008)
DOI: 10.1177/0269216307087140


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?