Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seale, C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seale, C
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

research-article

End-of-life decisions in the UK involving medical practitioners

C Seale

Centre for Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London c.seale{at}qmul.ac.uk

This study estimates the frequency of different medical end-of-life decisions (ELDs) made in the United Kingdom (UK) in 2007–2008, comparing these with 2004. Postal survey was carried out with 8857 medical practitioners, of whom 3733 (42%) practitioners replied, with 2869 having attended a person who died in the previous year. The proportion of UK deaths involving (1) voluntary euthanasia (0.21%; CI: 0–0.52), (2) physician-assisted suicide (0.00%) and (3) ending of life without an explicit request from the patient (0.30%; CI: 0–0.60) is low. Better questions about ELDs showed both non-treatment decisions (21.8%; CI: 19.0–24.5) and double effect measures (17.1%; CI: 14.6–19.6) to be much less common than suggested in earlier estimates, rarely involving intent to end life or being judged to have shortened life by more than a day. Continuous deep sedation (16.5%; CI: 14.3–18.7) is relatively common in UK medical practice, particularly in hospitals, home care settings and with younger patients. Further findings about the distribution of ELDs across subgroups are also reported. Survey research in this area requires careful control over question wording if valid estimates and comparisons of the prevalence of ELDs are to be made. The high rate of sedation compared with other countries may be a cause for concern.

Key Words: continuous deep sedation • euthanasia • physician-assisted suicide • terminal care • withdrawing treatment • withholding treatment

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 23, No. 3, 198-204 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0269216308102042


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
C. Seale
Counting end of life decisions
BMJ, September 14, 2009; 339(sep14_1): b3690 - b3690.
[Full Text]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
E Grogan, R Beattie, C Campbell, R George, T Harlow, B MacGregor, D Oliver, A Thorns, and B Noble
End-of-life decisions in the United Kingdom involving medical practitioners and legalisation of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide: survey of doctors' attitudes
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2009; 23(6): 569 - 569.
[PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
C Seale
End-of-life decisions in the UK: a response to van der Heide and colleagues
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2009; 23(6): 567 - 568.
[PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
A. van der Heide, B Onwuteaka-Philipsen, L Deliens, J. van Delden, and P. van der Maas
End-of-life decisions in the United Kingdom
Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2009; 23(6): 565 - 566.
[PDF]