Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dunt, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Temple-Smith, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dunt, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Temple-Smith, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The cost-effectiveness of the Citymission Hospice Programme, Melbourne

David R. Dunt

Department of Community Medicine, University of Melbourne

Annie M. Cantwell

Department of Community Medicine, University of Melbourne

Meredith J. Temple-Smith

Department of Community Medicine, University of Melbourne

A quasiexperimental study evaluating the Citymission Hospice Programme, Melbourne, a demonstration programme funded by the WK Kellogg Foundation and the Federal Australian government, is described. Its cost-effectiveness is compared with the best available programme of care, as traditionally delivered. Sixty-five hospice and 55 control patients, and/or their family caregiver, were interviewed monthly until the patient's death, generating 271 patient and 195 caregiver interviews. Patients in the hospice group experienced a small but statistically significant reduction in pain, variously assessed at the first and last assessment. They also suffered similarly small but significant reductions in dyspnoea, insomnia and dissatisfaction with the care at the last assessment before death. Patients in the two groups did not differ in their level of other physical and emotional symptoms or in a number of quality-of-life measures. Relatives and other individuals caring for patients in the hospice group experienced somewhat greater difficulties in their role as caregivers than those in the control group. The care of hospice patients was no less expensive and did not produce a shift to noninstitutional care. It is concluded that the cost and effectiveness of this programme of hospice care is at least equivalent to the best traditional care.

Key Words: cost benefit analysis • direct service costs • evaluation studies • health planning • hospices • palliative treatment

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 2, 125-134 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921638900300207


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
Y. Tibi-Levy, M. Le Vaillant, and G. de Pouvourville
Determinants of resource utilization in four palliative care units
Palliative Medicine, March 1, 2006; 20(2): 95 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Palliat MedHome page
Y. Tibi-Levy and D. d'Herouville
Developing an operational typology of patients hospitalised in palliative care units
Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2004; 18(3): 248 - 258.
[Abstract] [PDF]