|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Evaluation of palliative care: steps to quality assurance?
Irene Higginson
Department of Community Medicine, University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London
Mark McCarthy
Department of Community Medicine, University College and Middlesex School of Medicine, London
We have reviewed the UK and North American evaluations of hospice and palliative care and consider the future needs for evaluation and quality assurance. Nonrandomized studies on single sites in the UK suggested that inpatient hospice care is more effective than hospital care, however, comparisons of hospital care with outpatient or home hospice care were equivocal. In North America the converse was found: one randomized controlled trial showed few advantages of inpatient hospice care compared with conventional care, while in another study, patients randomly allocated to a home care team reported greater satisfaction and spent more time at home than the controls. Multicentre studies in the UK have described only the process of care, whereas North American studies (especially the National Hospice Study) have included outcome measures. Their general conclusion, that hospice care was not worse than conventional care and in some special centres was better, is not likely to satisfy most health service managers and planners nor many hospice staff. Hospice care is now well established and it will be difficult to set up further randomized trials in the future. Yet many aspects of the services remain to be evaluated. Studies in progress in the UK are developing methods for clinical audit of care; these may prove useful guides to quality assurance in palliative medicine.
Key Words: evaluation studies • hospices • palliative treatment • quality assurance • quality of health care
Palliative Medicine, Vol. 3, No. 4,
267-274 (1989)
DOI: 10.1177/026921638900300406
 CiteULike  Complore  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
C Salisbury, N Bosanquet, E K Wilkinson, P J Franks, S Kite, M Lorentzon, and A Naysmith
The impact of different models of specialist palliative care on patients' quality of life: a systematic literature review
Palliative Medicine,
January 1, 1999;
13(1):
3 - 17.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Maguire, S. Walsh, J. Jeacock, and R. Kingston
Physical and psychological needs of patients dying from colo-rectal cancer
Palliative Medicine,
January 1, 1999;
13(1):
45 - 50.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Raftery, J. Addington-Hall, L. MacDonald, H. Anderson, J. Bland, J. Chamberlain, and P. Freeling
A randomized controlled trial of the cost-effectiveness of a district co-ordinating service for terminally ill cancer patients
Palliative Medicine,
April 1, 1996;
10(2):
151 - 161.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Addington-Hall and M. McCarthy
Dying from cancer: results of a national population-based investigation
Palliative Medicine,
October 1, 1995;
9(4):
295 - 305.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Addington-Hall and M. McCarthy
Regional Study of Care for the Dying: methods and sample characteristics
Palliative Medicine,
January 1, 1995;
9(1):
27 - 35.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. J Boyd
The working patterns of hospice based home care teams
Palliative Medicine,
April 1, 1992;
6(2):
131 - 139.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Tsamandouraki, Y. Tountas, and D. Trichopoulos
Relative survival of terminal cancer patients in home versus hospital care
Scand J Public Health,
March 1, 1992;
20(1):
51 - 54.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. McCarthy and I. Higginson
Clinical audit by a palliative care team
Palliative Medicine,
July 1, 1991;
5(3):
215 - 221.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. Dicks
The contribution of nursing to palliative care
Palliative Medicine,
July 1, 1990;
4(3):
197 - 203.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. McCarthy
Hospice patients: a pilot study in 12 services
Palliative Medicine,
April 1, 1990;
4(2):
93 - 104.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
