This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lang, C. C Articles by Macrae, W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lang, C. C Articles by Macrae, W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Drug management of pain caused by cancer: a study of general practitioners' treatment attitudes and practices

Paul HG Beardon

Myles Ladlow

William Macrae

This study assesses the treatment attitudes and practices of general practitioners in the management of pain caused by cancer. The study consisted of two parts: (1) a questionnaire survey of 328 GPs (including trainees) in Tayside, Scotland and (2) an analysis using duplicate prescriptions of all opioid analgesic prescribing over a five-year period among the doctors in a primary health care centre (population 11500). In the questionnaire survey, 63% (206) of the GPs replied. Of these respondents, 80% were prepared to manage malignant pain on their own and 17% would refer 'frequently' to the local hospice. Only 19% of respondents work in collaboration with the pain clinic and, if so, the pain clinic undertakes most of the decisions made on pain management. Co-proxamol (paracetamol plus dextropropoxyphene hydrochloride preparation) was the preferred analgesic for mild to moderate pain due to cancer and controlled-release morphine sulphate was preferred for severe pain. Duplicate prescription monitoring showed that 24% (2722) of patients received one or more prescriptions for opioid analgesics over the study period. Forty-five per cent of the patients were prescribed co-proxamol. When morphine sulphate or diamorphine was prescribed (3% and 1 % of patients respectively), laxatives were frequently coprescribed (64% and 58% respectively), as were anti-emetics (57% and 32% respectively). This study therefore shows that most GPs manage pain caused by cancer without help from hospital specialists. This study also shows a degree of awareness concerning good prescribing practice in cancer pain.

Key Words: attitudes of health personnel • neoplasms • opioids • pain • palliative treatment • primary health care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 6, No. 3, 246-252 (1992)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639200600309


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Low, M. Cloherty, S. Wilkinson, S. Barclay, and A. Hibble A UK-wide postal survey to evaluate palliative care education amongst General Practice Registrars Palliative Medicine, June 1, 2006; 20(4): 463 - 469. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. K Mitchell How well do general practitioners deliver palliative care? A systematic review Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2002; 16(6): 457 - 464. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Zeppetella How do terminally ill patients at home take their medication? Palliative Medicine, September 1, 1999; 13(6): 469 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF]