This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Higginson, I. J. Articles by McCarthy, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Higginson, I. J. Articles by McCarthy, M. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Family Issues Palliative Care Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Validity of the support team assessment schedule: do staffs' ratings reflect those made by patients or their families?

Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Mark McCarthy

This study aimed to assess the validity of the Support Team Assessment Schedule (STAS), a measure of the outcome of palliative care, through comparisons with the views of patients and family members. STAS ratings completed by two support teams were compared with (1) patients' ratings and (2) family member/carer ratings of seven (of the total 17 STAS) items, collected by independent interviewers. Of 183 patients referred to the teams, 84 (46%) were interviewed and 99 (54%) could not be contacted. Sixty-seven patients had family members or carers, all of whom were interviewed. Tests for agreement between team and patient were high for four items, and showed moderate correlations (Spearman's rho ranged 0.45-0.66) for five items, excepting two items including family needs. The summed scores for seven items were correlated, rho = 0.66, p < 0.0001. Where differences were found, team members identified more problems than patients' self-ratings, except for one item, 'pain control', where team members identified fewer problems. Team ratings were usually closer to those of the patients than to those of the family member; a team rating often lay between the patient's and family member's rating. The STAS is a measure of professional assessment which is independent from, although based on, the patient and family. The results support the validity of STAS as a measure of the outcome of palliative care from the perspective of a palliative care team.

Key Words: audit • hospices • measurement • quality of life • terminal care • validation

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 3, 219-228 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639300700309


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Grunfeld, A. Folkes, and R. Urquhart Do Available Questionnaires Measure the Communication Factors That Patients and Families Consider Important at End of Life? J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2008; 26(23): 3874 - 3878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]