Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by King, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodward, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by King, B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Caregivers
*Family Issues
*Palliative Care
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Survivor focus groups: a quality assurance technique

Christel A. Woodward

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Room 3H4, Health Sciences Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada

Bernice King

The use of a total quality management frame work by the palliative care team (PCT) at the Chedoke-McMaster hospitals has led to a standardized method of obtaining feedback from some of the hospitals' customers. Every three months, a focus group is convened of randomly chosen significant others who were most involved in a nonprofessional caregiving role for the deceased patients. The participants are invited to discuss their perceptions of the quality of care provided by the PCT and how it could be improved. This paper describes the procedures used and feedback received in the first year of this audit procedure. The lessons learned during implementation of this audit procedure and how this feedback has affected the PCT's functioning are discussed. This process can provide information for continuous improvement of the care provided by the PCT.

Key Words: consumer satisfaction • death • family • health services research • quality of health care • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 7, No. 3, 229-234 (1993)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639300700310
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?