This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rathbone, G. Articles by Goacher, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rathbone, G. Articles by Goacher, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

A self-evaluated assessment suitable for seriously ill hospice patients

Sue Ryder Hospice, Staunton Harold Hall, Leicestershire

S. Horsley

Sue Ryder Hospice, Staunton Harold Hall, Leicestershire

J. Goacher

Sue Ryder Hospice, Staunton Harold Hall, Leicestershire

Current quality of life (QOL) assessments, whilst being suitable for patients undergoing active treatment, are often too cumbersome for patients who are in the terminal phase of their illness, and may themselves produce distress.

In an attempt to measure QOL in these patients a simple assessment was piloted (PEPS - patient evaluated problem score) in which patients were asked to identify and grade major problems as they perceived them and also to grade problems previously identified by the medical and nursing staff. A global QOL score and a self-administered WHO score completed the assessment.

Of 70 patients admitted to the unit over a seven-month period, 44 completed questionnaires, 38 in full. Subsequently, uptake has been far greater (due to establishment of the method as part of routine care) with 73% of all patients admitted to our unit completing PEPS. Overall, a mean of 5.6 problems per patient were identified, of which 14% were psychosocial. Of those patients who completed questionnaires, 58% identified problems not picked up by the nursing and medical staff; 52% of these were psychosocial problems. Of 28 patients who died having previously completed questionnaires 22 had done so in the previous three weeks including eight in the previous seven days.

PEPS has proved very useful in the management of patients, enabling the identification of previously unrecognized or underrated problems, particularly of a psychosocial nature, and also as a means of evaluating progress. It is readily acceptable to patients, even those close to death.

Key Words: hospice • palliative treatment • quality of life • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 1, 29-34 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639400800105


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. S. Jordhoy, G. Inger Ringdal, J. L. Helbostad, L. Oldervoll, J. H. Loge, and S. Kaasa Assessing physical functioning: a systematic review of quality of life measures developed for use in palliative care Palliative Medicine, December 1, 2007; 21(8): 673 - 682. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. J. Pearson, J. G Todd, and J. M Futcher How can occupational therapists measure outcomes in palliative care? Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2007; 21(6): 477 - 485. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Saxby, R. Ackroyd, S. Callin, C. Mayland, and S. Kite How should we measure emesis in palliative care? Palliative Medicine, July 1, 2007; 21(5): 369 - 383. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Horton Differences in assessment of symptoms and quality of life between patients with advanced cancer and their specialist palliative care nurses in a home care setting Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2002; 16(6): 488 - 494. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M G. Carson, M. I Fitch, and M. L S Vachon Measuring patient outcomes in palliative care: a reliability and validity study of the Support Team Assessment Schedule Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 25 - 36. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G E Grande and C J Todd Why are trials in palliative care so difficult? Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2000; 14(1): 69 - 74. [PDF]

				N Pratheepawanit, M S Salek, and I G Finlay The applicability of quality-of-life assessment in palliative care: comparing two quality-of-life measures Palliative Medicine, June 1, 1999; 13(4): 325 - 334. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Maguire, S. Walsh, J. Jeacock, and R. Kingston Physical and psychological needs of patients dying from colo-rectal cancer Palliative Medicine, January 1, 1999; 13(1): 45 - 50. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C E Urch, J Chamberlain, and G Field The drawback of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in the assessment of depression in hospice inpatients Palliative Medicine, July 1, 1998; 12(5): 395 - 396. [PDF]

				C. M Heaven and P. Maguire Disclosure of concerns by hospice patients and their identification by nurses Palliative Medicine, July 1, 1997; 11(4): 283 - 290. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Robin Cohen, B. M Mount, E. Bruera, M. Provost, J. Rowe, and K. Tong Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain Palliative Medicine, January 1, 1997; 11(1): 3 - 20. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Johnston and C. Abraham The WHO objectives for palliative care: to what extent are we achieving them? Palliative Medicine, April 1, 1995; 9(2): 123 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF]