Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Palliative Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hinton, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hinton, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Cancer
*Home Care Services
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Which patients with terminal cancer are admitted from home care?

John Hinton

Emeritus Professor of Psychiatry, St Christopher's Hospice, London

The factors related to admission of patients with terminal cancer who had been referred to a reputable home care service were examined in 415 patients referred in a two-year period and in a prospective study of a randomized one in three sample of the 232 adults still alive one week after referral, who were able to converse and be at home with caring relatives. The reasons given by staff for intermediate admissions were mostly to improve symptom control or provide respite; for final admissions the reasons were symptom control, patients' deteriorated state and relatives needing relief. Independent weekly assessments usually concurred in showing increasing problems or distress preceding final admission, particularly patients' weakness, pain, depression and anxiety, and relatives' fatigue, anxiety or depression.

Examination of selected demographic and illness factors indicated that few patients living alone or with unfit relatives stayed at home; breast cancer led to more deaths as an inpatient, whereas stomach cancer favoured deaths at home. The proportion of patients admitted steadily increased as care lengthened. Assessments of psychological factors showed that initial attitudes of denial, conscious fighting of disease, and optimism were linked with increased late admissions; earlier awareness of dying in patients and stoicism in relatives favoured home deaths. A growing preference for inpatient care usually preceded or accompanied admission. Recognition of both immediate and underlying causes of admission can indicate where further treatment or assistance is needed and also improve understanding so that patients and relatives may be suitably supported or helped to adjust.

Key Words: adaptation • psychological • cancer care facilities • family • pain • quality of life • terminal care

Palliative Medicine, Vol. 8, No. 3, 197-210 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/026921639400800303


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Munday, M. Petrova, and J. Dale
Exploring preferences for place of death with terminally ill patients: qualitative study of experiences of general practitioners and community nurses in England
BMJ, July 15, 2009; 339(jul15_1): b2391 - b2391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]