This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0269216308092287v1 22/7/787    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Agar, M Articles by Abernethy, A P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Agar, M Articles by Abernethy, A P Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Caregivers Palliative Care Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Preference for place of care and place of death in palliative care: are these different questions?

¹ Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia; Department of Palliative Care, Braeside Hospital, Prairiewood, New South Wales
² Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia
³ Department of Anaesthesia, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia
⁴ Department of Palliative and Supportive Services, Flinders University, Daw Park, South Australia; Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed.

	Abstract

Place of death is at times suggested as an outcome for palliative care services. This study aimed to describe longitudinal preferences for place of care and place of death over time for patients and their caregivers. Longitudinal paired data of patient/caregiver dyads from a prospective unblinded cluster randomised control trial were used. Patients and caregivers were separately asked by the palliative care nurse their preference at that time for place of care and place of death. Longitudinal changes over time for both questions were mapped; patterns of agreement (patient and caregiver; and preference for place of death when last asked and actual placed of death) were analysed with kappa statistics. Seventy-one patient/caregiver dyads were analysed. In longitudinal preferences, preferences for both the place of care (asked a mean of >6 times) and place of death (asked a mean of >4 times) changed for patients (28% and 30% respectively) and caregivers (31% and 30%, respectively). In agreement between patients and caregivers, agreement between preference of place of care and preferred place of death when asked contemporaneously for patients and caregivers was low [56% ( 0.33) and 36% ( 0.35) respectively]. In preference versus actual place of death, preferences were met for 37.5% of participants for home death; 62.5% for hospital; 76.9% for hospice and 63.6% for aged care facility. This study suggests that there are two conversations: preference for current place of care and preference for care at the time of death. Place of care is not a euphemism for place of death; and further research is needed to delineate these. Patient and caregiver preferences may not change simultaneously. Implications of any mismatch between actual events and preferences need to be explored.

Key Words: caregivers, health service planning, palliative care utilisation, place of care, place of death

First published on August 28, 2008, doi:10.1177/0269216308092287

Palliative Medicine 2008;22:787.

A more recent version of this article appeared on October 1, 2008


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Bell, E Somogyi-Zalud, and K. Masaki Methodological review: measured and reported congruence between preferred and actual place of death Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2009; 23(6): 482 - 490. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G Grande Palliative care in hospice and hospital: time to put the spotlight on neglected areas of research Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2009; 23(3): 187 - 189. [PDF]

				G. Grande, G Ewing, and On behalf of the National Forum for Hospice at Hom Informal carer bereavement outcome: relation to quality of end of life support and achievement of preferred place of death Palliative Medicine, April 1, 2009; 23(3): 248 - 256. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M Costantini Editorial: Place of death. It is time for a change of gear Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2008; 22(7): 785 - 786. [PDF]